If you can’t hold children in detention for more than a certain period of time and you are going to hold adults in detention (and that takes longer than the period of time), how does the ruling not force the separation?

Which is why the laws should be changed, by congress as opposed to wishing the President didn’t enforce them.

It literally states that you can’t hold children for more than 20 days which means after the parents are busted and claim asylum (which takes longer than 20 days), the kids get separated and held for a short period before the kids go to a family member or foster parent. By function of the ruling, it absolutely means…

By zero tolerance, you just mean enforcing the laws as they are written, correct? Also, everyone claims asylum after they are caught because it is the only possible way to stay. Unless you are Mexican (most people are not further south Central American countries), or came on a plane, or boat, you can’t possibly have a…

Well the two options, if you plan on holding people for deportation, are holding families together (which the 9th circuit court overuled) or separating them. If you argument is that they just shouldn’t enforce immigration law, then that is a separate argument, but if you are going to enforce the law, this is the…

Well, I am now 15 years older than that first experience. So blacking out on purpose isn’t really a goal to be achieved anymore.

“But as countless people have pointed out, Congress didn’t create this problem. The Trump regime created this problem with the purpose of separating children from their families as a “deterrent” so that people fleeing violence in Central America would not come to the U.S. to seek asylum.”

Fun Fact, if you just hold the plastic part of the cord instead of the prongs, you won’t shock yourself.

True, without the chattering class, who will reach these keeeeds?

Depends on my goal for the day/evening. If I want to stay coherent, it is beer. If my goal is to go from zero to 100% as quickly as possible, your advice seems okay.

I think I learned this my freshman year of college. If a bar is crowded, and you are trying to tie one on, you order multiple beers at once.

“I immediately knew my answer: ordering two beers at the same time like Ta-Nehisi Coates does in Between The World And Me. At least, that’s what I’ve spent the last three years believing he does.”

Have you all ever interviewed someone who writes the storyline for wrestling? I’d be curious who does that job and if they just hit the main plot points and the wrestlers improv from there or if it is heavily scripted.

Pennsylvania is misleading in that Philly and Pittsburgh are both blue and high population, but physically small compared to Pennsyltucky.

This is mind boggling. I could understand them telling me a car is functionally valueless, but at that point, give me $100 bucks for scrap value. I don’t even think I would get rid of a broken car for free.

And this is why scientific solutions are better than keeping people in misery.

No, because they never predict extinction level events.

A scientific miracle? Crop rotation, GMOs, cross-breeding, and irrigation aren’t miracles. They are the growth of thousands of years of learning and experience.

“2. show any place where population shrinks, then show that its culture is not a unique case, unique to that moment in time”

That’s a dumb take given that we know populations grow until a country gets wealthy and then they continually shrink. The US is barely at replacement rate. Europe is under the replacement rate. As your country gets wealthy, you don’t need kids to take care of you in old age.