There could be a valid reason they didn’t care (abuse, borderline personality disorder, etc), but if that is the case, they would also have trouble in court because one of the factors is closeness to the deceased. If you hated or didn’t care about your parent (rightfully or wrongfully), you are going to have trouble…

That sounds maybe 10X higher than my guess. There is already a bunch of actuarial science that goes into this sort of stuff. The biggest factor is future earnings. She was homeless so no future earnings and the family wouldn’t look particularly sympathetic in a jury verdict given that they allowed her to be homeless…

I’m guessing the settlement was low. The family obviously didn’t give much a shit while she was living given that she was homeless. I’m guessing they settled for less than what it would have cost uber to spin up their legal team.

The type of people who are willing to allow their family member to be homeless are also the type of people who are willing to settle quickly for a nominal amount.

He also has a boner in this video.

Radical centrist is a joke phrase. I realize it this.

*you’re, not your

Yeah, I usually get angry about deliberate mischaracterizations. You should see my work on other sites. As a radical centrists, it is a lot of work dealing with ideologues on both sides.

That doesn’t make sense given that our reliance on technology gives us a huge advantage over people who relied on nature to provide everything.

“Meanwhile, fewer Republicans think global warming is happening already (not accurate), and that scientists agree it’s happening (also not accurate).”

Which one? Germany? Because South Africa might not be what we would call racist, but the majority population (Bantu) fucking hate the Cape Africans and other Africans Non-Bantu origin.

Baiting people into being your fan? Baiting people into singing along with your music? Baiting people into saying the N-word? This doesn’t even make sense.

Yes.

Nah. I generally get mad about all sensationalized headlines.

What is the acceptable terminology to call out a purposefully dishonest and title that mischaracterized what happened?

The addition of the word “social” to the already excellent word “justice” just makes it collective. For there to be social justice, you must necessarily sacrifice individual justice or as the entire Western world calls it, justice. Very few people enjoy injustice. Lots of people are rightly terrified at collective…

No. I said it had no moral value. Not immoral. It is neither moral or immoral. Only that discrimination is immoral.

Putting up your home equity to payoff a prostitute is far too selfless for Gordon Bombay.

I’m embarrassed by Kevin’s the most because as a DC resident, the local elections are the only thing that matters. As someone who voted Johnson, I literally only bothered because the local elections matter quite a bit. I at least appreciate Bill’s not giving any fucks as opposed to Alex’s lengthy take on why he is…

Are you willfully misunderstanding my take? I’ve already made it clear that saying the n word in song isn’t a great idea. But implying that singing along to a song (meaning all songs people listen to) is a totally normal activity that literally everyone does. While most people are smart enough to not say the nword…