I’m not sending him to the gallows. I am just guessing based on what I know about him. My comment has no bearing on the NFL or potential legal troubles. I said almost because I am not certain.

Yeah. I’m not a juror. I’m a guy judging based on the shit that has been published about him in the past.

Take my star, you bastard.

Okay, so not witnesses. Bizarre framing.

That’s a weird way to use the term witness. This isn’t a judgement of the victim, but of buzzfeed.

I read that to mean they were in a fast food drive thru, but if it was in a restaurant, that makes sense.

So he is definitely a scumbag and almost certainly did this, but if they were the only two people in the car, how does this part happen:

Weird fact, the appropriate tactical mustache is the Charlie Chaplin/Hitler ‘stache. The origins of it were based on the fact regular mustaches don’t allow a proper seal on a gas mask, but if you cut off the sides, then your mask will seal. WWI trivia is weird.

They shave him into a porno stache in one of the videos where they are talking about why cops love body on frame crown vics.

If they want international experience and the appearance of not being sexist or racist, hasn’t Condi Rice publically stated NFL commissioner is her dream job?

Just get an indemnity clause. Then it doesn’t matter if you are personally liable.

It is actually a great guarantee. Not because it is real, but because there won’t be anyone to collect.

I have no idea.

If you want to go deeper, you can, but giving a high level example to morons on the internet seems the most utilitarian for the purpose of the discussion.

What are you talking about? The only one that would obviously describe a government employee is a net positive tax contribution. The rest are up for grabs based on the individual. Also, government employees already live in the US, why would we be vetting them for immigration?

Except immigrating to the US isn’t the justice system and nobody has a right to enter the country who isn’t a citizen.

No, you use systems like these for positive discrimination, meaning the people who don’t need substantial vetting for terrorism. If you want me to do the profile for economic or military espionage, I can do that too. Hint, it isn’t Muslim dudes and statistically, you’d weigh those two issues a lot higher because…

If they are smart, they would just use the software to dictate where to focus their human resources. This is pretty standard. You would just use relevant data points to positively discriminate against people who don’t need further vetting. For instance, if you are looking for terrorists, single women can slide right…

Reposting since GearoidDubh likes to dismiss comments that refute his or her inane commentary.

There is nothing vague about contribution to society. If your net tax contributions are positive, you contribute to society. If you don’t commit crimes, you contribute to society. If you have relevant and necessary job skills, you contribute to society. If you have liberal (in the enlightenment sense) views, you…