Here u r going on about this days later. Boring.

Why is it so many ppl in forums use words that mean what they think? When you call people that disagree with you "fussy loons", you're getting into name calling. Nothing reasonable about that.

Well edked, I'm not sure how reasonable you can claim to be when you get so worked up over the issue. I mean, we can disagree without insults and you don't need to call people "fussy loons" because they share the same point of view as me. If you get this emotional over something so little then maybe you're the one…

Then why have a site wide scoring system? If there is no correlation between what an A or F stands for on the site, then what purpose does it serve?
If the scores are nothing more than random opinions of a singular writer, then let that writer come up with their own scoring system. Like McCown could have a 1 to 5…

I'm barely hanging on here, more out of curiosity than actual enjoyment. And according to the AVClub rating system, this episode is a B- while the season finale of GOT was B+? I've had plenty of criticisms of GOT but my god, the quality of the story telling and every other element of GOT is dramatically better than…

The problem I have with the Ben death and not showing his body is that they've already shown somebody attacked by the abbies only to have them wake up in the bottom of a pit. They established that people that are attacked aren't necessarily dead. So we the audience won't think Ben is actually dead until we see proof…

Very strange to see such a negative review to maybe the most satisfying episodes of the series. I've certainly had my problems with loose ends and unsatisfying moments but this review puts the nit in nitpick.

I wondered the same thing. I can't keep up with the minutia of everything that matters in the show but does this make a difference, if true, in the original election? Wasn't there some sort of moment where they decided to not win in a courtroom scene?
Or was it just a finale gag for that character?

I'm not even sold on the idea that you would be forcing births at this point. It's not like they have a vast area to expand into. With murderous abbies trying to kill anybody outside the walls and burning their fields, having more mouths to feed doesn't seem like the best way forward.

A society that forces girls to get impregnated as soon as possible has crossed a moral line that easily includes death to gay people. Gay people wouldn't contribute in the way they think is most important.

Thanks for confirming that we never see Ben's face. I was like you. I kept waiting for the obvious and then thought he must not actually be dead. I thought it was going to be some body with Ben's clothes and a mangled face so maybe it wasn't actually him. But they would have shown that.
The only thing that makes…

I'm very curious about the script writing on this series. The quality is wildly different. A lot is eye rolling and then we have a moment like the dinner scene when Rebecca realizes she's with a bunch of crazies and it suddenly is brilliant. That is how somebody reacts when such a thing dawns on them.

This ending felt sort of tacked on when they learned they would not be renewed. It just seemed like motivations changed abruptly for no good reason. As mentioned before, Vanessa was hell bent on destroying Dracula and then simply fell under his spell. Then she promised some sort of final bloodbath with Ethan then…

Not sure if we are supposed to continue to think any of the Stark men have any right to rule. They repeatedly made so many bad decisions that it certainly isn't in the best interest of those that would follow them.

Turned this episode off about 15 minutes in. Done with the series. Tired of the quirky-for-quirky sakes characters and ridiculous characterizations. It's not that it's too weird or anything but it's boring and plays like it was written by a 12 year old.

Is there a rule in drama about how many characters and how many times those characters can switch between the good guys and bad before the material is officially a soap opera? I've loved this show since the beginning but the twist and turns have stopped having any meaning because we know they will simply twist and…

In Kirkman's world We'd be looking at 20 seasons of people with their thumbed up their asses while the show runners waited for GRRM to finish the books. I prefer the way they're doing it now. We've all seen how horrible the Walking Dead method works.

Two things are different between the two. 1. Vanessa is struggling mightily against these forces and 2. Eva Green is an amazing actress that can turn a bottle episode inside a bare room into a tour de force.
Important differences.

Sudden as in for the audience. Ethan had been a sympathetic and heroic character for the entire series. Now we are supposed to understand that he is in fact an unrepentant murderer who plans to murder again AND bring about the end of mankind. I just don't think I'll be rooting for him anymore.

This was the first episode of the series where I felt like they really have hit a wall. Maybe jumped the shark is the right phrase but it just seems like they are extending the story in nonsensical ways with ever more layers on top of layers that in the end mean very little. I've been pretty emotionally disconnected…