That's the most important detail, ideas aren't IP.

Get a case with handles.

It is the employees that "waste time" in this manner that become the most productive.

Basically, do the opposite of whatever a CEO or politician would do.

Better?

Hey now, Taco Bell is a classy joint.

My appologies, it is an internet MEME.

I take the default that I am wrong until I have enough supporting evidence that I could possibly be right.

"If you beat your woman, don't complain when she cuts it off"

"Only rich people can buy cheap shoes"

Asking for forgiveness is something that is done after permission is repeatedly shot down. If their answer is going to be a flat-out "no," regardless of the question, then you might as well do what you need to do. Others try the ad nauseam approach, continually rephrasing their question until they get the answer that…

TL:DW

Your context stipulates that I can't 'own' a book despite being able to read it, fold it, write on it, sell it, give it away, or burn it. While I'm limited by copyright from copying it, I can still make captions. I'm well aware I shouldn't make a copy of a book and put my name as the author and go about selling it to…

Funny...it would appear as though I'm the one with the popular support...

'Ownership' has never really existed for software.

If you can't see the difference between handing someone a disc and saying have at er' or being able selling your used copy after you decide you're done with it, compared to 24 hour DRM check-ins and not being able to sell your physical media that is not Arnheim fault.

I wish there was a superior distribution that would keep the instruments or channels separate with higher clarity rather than muddying them all together. Perhaps a physical soundstage standard to go along with it.