It is going to be difficult for SCOTUS to rule in 1964 Congress was looking to protect a class of persons who were not discussed. It a fine line of writing law versus applying it. It is gonna take a stretch especially from this group, but it would be a good stretch. If they loose we can just make it the law when…

If they pass theesolution their subpoena power is enforced by jail.

They are going to have to pass the resolution  or their gun has no bullets.

Well once again as with the 2nd amendment we are looking at what the law said/meant when they passed it and what is should mean now. Obviously there was no discussion in 1964 of the law applying to such people so it is a stretch but a good one.  I dont see it happening though.

Wow this is getting good now, at least from a a constitutional law view. They ar going to have to do a resolution if they expect the Federal Courts to enforce their subpoenas.  Many dont have the balls to go on the record.

60% of the republican voters are white no college, 29% for dems.  I have to lay the loyalty on this 60%.  They dont know the definitions of treason and impeachment they just love the way he goes after the other side.  They think he kicks ass.  

Well where do you think the Kurds were getting food for 60,000 people. And shelter and sanitation , they have no means to provide it. Trump speaks in dollars when he says we have been doing it. As for me every American out of any of those  countries is a huge win. I want no more dead kids for that freaking cluster…

Senate isnt gonna impeach him for ukraine, they need pile all the graft on to try to make them look ridiculous for not impeaching him, the only hope.

Well now that mitch finally spoke via an ad and said this nonsense will end at the senate, they may have just decided to stop fueling the fire. NO Shortage of wackjobs willing to defend him on TV but this is a new strategy.

Splinter seems to want tip toe around the Bidens graft revealed by Trumps extortion.   Not sure why but the stench of the swamp now engulfs his campaign .Donations are not going to pour in  

Looking more and more like Mitch will throw him under the bus. who do we get. Romney?

“We are hereby transmitting” means the subpoena was attached and it clearly had a list attached to it.  

The son was given the directorship and $1M with a 50k a month salary. HE had no qualifications and doesnt speak the language. This is classic swamp shit. We should  use it to loose biden.

The insiders are keeping as many candidates in now to keep the heat and focus off Biden so he wont keep blowing it.  How are we gonna keep the from derailing either of our candidates.  I don’t have a good feeling about this convention.  The solution in my opinion is unify behind Warren and hang Bidens nepotism around…

So what, we are ok with Biden’s son with no connection to the UKRAINE or experience or eduacation in the industry receiving 1M$ and 50k a month for nothing?   THAT is swamp shit. 

When the ratings drop.  

Two important legal points. ONE, as all he knows is hearsay he can’t actually be a witness so cant be intimidated. Second, those were letters not subpoenas. THIS is what a subpoena from the house looks like. https://buckleyfirm.com/sites/default/files/Buckley%20Sandler%20InfoBytes%20-%20Cordray%20Subpoena%20%28House%…

Dont see how 14 days of SEPTEMBER cost Gm 1 billion.   .  

Well Shifty did embellish it using the words “dig up dirt” which was not in the transcript. Which was a mistake I Wish he hadnt made.

Well in the West we got winter.  48 inches of snow in Montana and cold temperatures in Norcal when we should be rollicking in the mid 80s.  What it Greta’s number again?