Update: So far “Boot licker” is ahead of “Fuck you” 13 to 7. “Ok boomer” is a distant 3rd. with 3 and “whataboutism” is bringing up the rear with 1.
Update: So far “Boot licker” is ahead of “Fuck you” 13 to 7. “Ok boomer” is a distant 3rd. with 3 and “whataboutism” is bringing up the rear with 1.
No. He is saying firing the cops who were following order is not going to affect any of the desired changes and is a typical, mob, emotional, knee-jerk reaction. In order to peacefully affect change, you need to call onto the carpet the individual(s) who actually issued this order, investigate why they did it, and…
If you aren’t interested in politics just gloss over anything that Justin writes. I think he’s the official political columnist at Jalopnik. Unfortunately, with many of the other writers gone he’s filling in with increasing amounts of political-but-vaguely related-to-automotive-so-I-can-rail-on-capitalism pieces.
Police have had un-Constitutional unrestricted assets confiscation for decades. This also includes assets destruction.
Hopefully Minneapolis will be paying to have these tires replaced and identifying and firing these officers.
Take it off. Ream the wholes to clean the edges and make then a consistent size. Get the right size plastic hold plugs. Paint them with correct touchup paint. Insert and DONE. Seriously, they look no worse then the sensors on front and rear bumpers and you’ll forget they are even there.
Most definitely the 503
No, it’s actually an homage to the Garmisch
I actually like the 2025 thing.
i’ll send you some pamphlets. look for the courier to arrive by horseback in two days’ time
That’s... that’s not how that works. Jesus Christ, that’s not how that works at all.
The trademark and copyright infringements were only if he were creating reproductions as a vendor. This is just some fan project he decided to do, no different than someone painting a Gulf livery on their Dodge Neon. He’s monetizing…
This is messed up. He's not going to start selling them, he's just entertaining YouTube viewers.
Right, I don’t see how the copyright holder would have any right to seize the vehicle. I can see having him take down the videos, but not seeing how it would result in the car being seized (couldn’t he take the parts and use it in another project?)
Of course, copyright holders are required to defend their properties
The YouTube channel in question is the popular B is for Build
I’m the same. About $1k over what I would be willing to pay. If it had a 3rd pedal and the headliner wasn’t preggers... maybe. But with an automatic, CP at almost any price. 90 hp and a 1980s automatic transmission is soul destroying, unless you are trying to get on the freeway, then it’s pants destroying.
First Impulse says “yes”. Further detail (auto, non-turbo) says “no”.
Seems like a lot of coin for a rather bland and long-forgotten model and brand. Sure, low mileage and good condition, but a forgettable design and not much going on under the hood.
*Stares at my Fiesta ST that almost got crushed by a Suburban on the way to work this morning* You’re on thin ice, bucko.