That's the best way to watch movies!

I wish the Academy would get creative, saying something like, "Affleck gave the best performance, but we're giving it to Washington instead". I suppose that would be sort of insulting to Washington, though?

It might not be a reason you (or I) agree with, but "awards should be given based solely on performance" is a sound reason, one that the academy evidently subscribes to.

You don't belong on the Internet, then. Or in politics.

It's closer to thirteen years, if that helps.

But what am I supposed to do with an empty mansion?

Why was it a surprise nomination? Was the sound mixing subpar (I didn't see it)? Or just because we don't like Michael Bay so much (I'm not much of a fan either)?

The Three Caballeros are always looking for more guns. That Donald Duck is insatiable!

Warner Brothers only had the funds to generate Razzie buzz for one of them.

They should have separate categories for big- and small-budget movies. A terrible movie with a big budget is a special kind of terrible.

I'm suddenly fascinated by the prospect. Someone write a screenplay!

WRONG!

I liked The King's Speech way more than The Social Network.

Glad to see that show getting some love around here. I seem to remember the commentariat being largely dismissive while it was running.

Marta doesn't get a real name? If that's not racist, I don't know what is, because there are no real-life examples I could compare it to.

Flarsky is a great name. It's not good enough to make me interested in the movie, though.

The alphabet is hard.

I just ordered a hat from their team store last week (because they're name and logo are awesome), and a sales guy called me the next day to make sure my address was correct. Those Baby Cakes are so friendly!

Are you sure? Your supervisor might frequent this website and have a penchant for fried meat tubes.

The Bully Pulpit is great and covers TR and Taft, if you're okay with a triple dip on TR.