Tell me, given your experience, do boots taste better than Nikes?

Wouldn’t a memo prohibiting the display of Nike products in reaction to recent press also potentially alienate a portion of the people they represent and serve?

That’s what’s wrong with cops. They think they are soldiers in a war against civilians.

The first amendment seems to follow this order of importance :

I don’t think they can restrict them from wearing certain brands, but they can say something like “no sneakers or logos” as part of a dress code, which would allow then to effectively ban Nike, along with a lot of other shit. However, just “no Nike” is a 1st Amendment violation (freedom of expression) since they are,…

These people got shit so twisted up in their mind. Do they even realize that Kaep isn’t playing football, and therefor not doing any kneeling during the anthem at their precious football games?

“Free Speech.... No! Not that speech!”

If they were federal bureaus, no -
5 CFR 2635.702 “An employee’s position or title should not be used to coerce; to endorse any product, service or enterprise; or to give the appearance of governmental sanction.”

2016 to the present has become Jim Crow 2: now with added stupidity. Ergo, we’ve gone back to legal being whatever stupid white men say it is.... not that we ever completely left that standard to begin with.

“That’s just pride fuckin’ with ya.”

No, and if somebody wants to go into a restroom with nefarious purposes, there are already laws against sexual assault, etc., and another law isn’t going to stop them. Bathroom bills only make criminals of transgender people.

Has there ever been a single case of a transgender person attempting to molest a child in a restroom? I’d be more worried about my kids spending time alone with a Republican wrestling coach.