FOX can say it truly is fair and impartial if they’re running ads like that I suppose. At least until their viewers throw a fit or whatever happened.

I’m sure that Trump voters all over give a shit.

It’s called “BBC Hard Talk” for a reason. That guy is fucking relentless.

You think that spending on education has actually improved outcomes in education? Citation, please.

No, Democrats could have went and argued that alternative energy not only could provide new jobs, but we’re idiots if we don’t aggressively pursue those sectors.

So put an end to the argument then. Is labeling Keillor among the “CRAZIES” vilifying in your mind or not?

No dash in “bargain basement” you ageist, half-literate.

That you consider ignoring ageism to be “the upside” on the issue proves my point. Thanks!

Again, filing an article about someone under “CRAZIES” is somehow not vilification in your mind? Do you think being categorized with the “CRAZIES” is a good thing? Please explain.

I bet you say that to every Boy Scout you meet when his parents aren’t around, don’t you?

YOU KILLED PIGEONS! YOU’RE A BASTARD! I MUST PROTEST!

YOU KILLED PIGEONS! YOU’RE A BASTARD! I MUST PROTEST!

If your objective is to kill as many people as possible, you’re wasting your time with a firearm. You can look to Nice to see what a vehicle can do. You can look to OK City to see what explosives can do.

STOP. WITH. BASIC. MATH.

How is working in, say, the Morrow building going to help you when someone decides to blow it up?

SIR! I beg to differ! If history has taught us anything it is that politely asking those who wish to rape, rob or kill us to POLITELY LEAVE THE PREMISES DOES WONDERS. Please, good Sir, cease with your talk of arming yourself to protect you and those you love from harm! NOTHING GOOD CAN COME OF THAT. STOP, SIR, STOP.

This article makes me wonder if anyone actually owned a gun? My guess would be that if someone owned a gun and felt it put them at risk, they’d get rid of it. OTOH, if someone felt safer with it, they’d keep it.

Eh, I wouldn’t make that assumption out of hand. There’s actual evidence that supports the idea that if a criminal thinks you may be armed, he’s not going to try and attack you. If you post NRA propaganda in your yard (much like security services tell you to put ADT signs up) it’s doubtful any criminal is going to…

Sir, I highly doubt that one of the suspect’s real name was J-Quan as reported in that verifiably true article.

You’re (futilely) trying to debate nonetheless. You’re not doing well at it, by the way.