Heretic! Guns serve no purpose but murder! No enjoyment with the guns! None! It’s forbidden! Stop saying your murder toy is fun!

So your idea of “debate” is ducking every question put to you, eh?

No! The real fun with this particular argument begins and ends with Gary Kleck.

Ah, so this is like high school debate! I thought you said that’s not what this was?!

Much the same as yourself, it would seem.

When the GOP, and their sick extremist agenda, has been beaten back to where they don’t control every single facet of how America is run and we can start to undo the damage they’ve wrought, then we can worry about restoring civility.

This article seems, at best, ageist and, at worst, mocking someone that genuinely may have dementia.

I know it’s waaaaayyyyyy early, but have you heard any reports on whether turnout was heavy or light? I know that many people were hoping that Democrats would buck the mid-term curse and show up but I think that’s always risky. I can’t find anything online that talks about it.

It’s not a surprise it went over the heads of about 75% of the commenters here.

This article seems, at best, ageist and, at worst, mocking someone that genuinely may have dementia.

To argue, one generally has to defend a position. He’s not doing that, as he claims he’s neither defending nor advocating for the author, so he’s not arguing for the sake of arguing.

What did the author file this story under? Where you live, is calling someone among the “CRAZIES” a good thing? You don’t think it vilifies Keillor, I get that, so what do you make of it?

The story is filed to “CRAZIES.” I take it that in your world, calling someone crazy isn’t vilification?

It’s true you “never argued any of that”, you just elected to defend it instead, with the rest of the Douche Brigade here.

This article seems, at best, ageist and, at worst, mocking someone that genuinely may have dementia.

This article seems, at best, ageist and, at worst, mocking someone that genuinely may have dementia.

This article seems, at best, ageist and, at worst, mocking someone that genuinely may have dementia.

This article seems, at best, ageist and, at worst, mocking someone that genuinely may have dementia.