“paying for other people’s stuff is how any insurance works”

ad hominem. always the sign of a winning argument.

“bent on making sure that they get every last nickel, even if it results in their children and grandchildren inheriting a worse-off world”

Dental care being provided by work is a relatively new phenomenon, and,

that “shark” is know locally as a dogfish

The problem with this piece is it conflates some moral choices with policy choices and views the world through a Manichean lense.

the Larry Fitzgerald comparison is superficial at best

i can live with a certain amount of defensive mindset designed to preserve the point — but:

I thought the input was pretty good, but some fallacies:

so — the Trump budget cuts positions by 7% (385 to 358) and its evidence of horrible intent

just a reminder:

“Let your kid mess up if they’re hellbent on messing up.”

as someone who has had to track, manage, etc the whole PTO thing — some employer’s perspective:

“Big government is the institution most suited to deploying the resources needed to fix most of these problems,”

you did use the words “approachable” , “relatable” and “honest” in refering to Hillary Clinton?

indy has decided to test the theory that a primate choosing names randomly can draft better than Ryan Grigson

i get the many student athletes choose that route — but i dont think they are forced into it

cost has little to do with it —

nope — and i would have no problem with it

athletes do get a choice — in the recruiting process, by choosing whatever offer to take. You can argue that what is offered by all the schools is undervalued, but there are choices.