It’s almost like these people get their opinions from legal TV shows and not the actual practice of law.

So, you’re an engineer trying to tell me how to practice law? You understand why your opinion is meaningless, right? Should I tell you how to engineer?

Uh... yeah, I use it every day and the product is just fine, if you understand how to use it. It is literally the EXACT SAME as the described ROSS.

This doesn’t change anything. Westlaw and Lexis already do exactly this. Further, you will commit malpractice if you abdicate your discretion to a computer program, one that already exists, mind you.

No, this isn’t a “lawyer” it’s virtually identical to Lexis Advanced or Westlaw Next. That is it. It has the exact capabilities that each of these services has, it is literally nothing new.

No, it’s downshifting you dumb fuck:

99.99% of the people on the internet are functionally retarded, as you’ve shown. I’m happy to be in the 0.01% that doesn’t include you.

If you don’t hit the gas you do, dumbass. Obviously, you’ve never driven a manual car.

Calm your tits, I’m married to a doctor. I’ve been in my fair share of emergency situations. You know, there are these things called ambulances. They take people to and from the hospital at rapid speeds with flashing lights and loud sirens.

It’s a gamble I’d be willing to take (actually, I willingly take it every day when I get in a car and gamble some asshole won’t kill me because he/she isn’t paying attention).

Nothing wrong with that, so long as it’s deserved. I think we mollycoddle too many people now. We’ve taught people they can be righteous assholes and there’s no repercussions because of “safe spaces” or “microagressions” or whatever buzzword fits the bill today.

I endeavor to be an ethical lawyer (and in corporate and tax, you get a bit of push back on that). I figure, I’ve spent about $250,000 and 8 years (4 undergrad, 3 JD, 1 LLM) in school and 4 years of practice. That’s not something I want to jeopardize by being shady or, as my Tax LLM Ethics Professor put it, “take the…

Yeah, or buzzfeed, or some other website. Pretty much. It’s why I can spend an hour on the internet and basically see every story from the day multiple times. They all copy each other, only adding the particular bias of the author.

It’s almost like being a real journalist requires investigative reporting and and an understanding of the subject matter instead of just regurgitating some talking point.

To be fair, most “journalists” aren’t journalists. Have you read a lot of articles on main stream media? The biggest example “journalistic” integrity that I think of is where they’re discussing some spurious study. The “journalist” in question has absolutely no ability to discern actual scientific evidence and…

Well... there’s your problem; you’re getting your news from Facebook.

Ah... you’re a conspiratorial idiot. Enjoy poverty, moron.

Wrong. Any surplus is retained earnings WHICH IS NOT PROFIT.

Really? Lowest form of ethics? I guess it doesn’t matter that lawyers have the highest form of ethics of any profession then. Moreover, you know all those rights you have? You’re welcome. You’d have exactly zero without lawyers.