Eggagerating.

Buckingham Palace (...I think...).

Before the part of my brain that recognizes logic and context kicked, I read “BP” in that comment as British Petroleum and was a bit disappoint that there wasn’t an oil-company based Diana conspiracy.

The emails sent at 5am complaint just baffles me every time.

re: Meghan as a bully, I suspect (and other commenters have remarked) that it’s possible (likely?) Meghan was just being a black woman who wasn’t afraid to be frank about what she wanted, what she didn’t want, and who was/was not meeting expectations.

THIS. And frankly, it galls me to see the family hand-wringing over Meghan’s behavior (who may be a bully or may just be someone who doesn’t fit in well in this strange family, who knows?) when they’ve not yet made any kind of meaningful investigation into or statement about the allegations against Andrew. They’re…

Add to that the fact the Queen ignored the fact Diana died for a week until Tony Blair basically told her, “Get you ass down to London before the crowd comes up there and drags you out by your hair”.

I am definitely of the camp that this progression started the minute they made Harry march through London behind his mother’s casket. The palace can reap what they sowed. Harry was out no matter what, and they are extra spectacularly mad that the person that pushed it over the edge is an American woman with a mixed…

It would be an interesting exercise to measure and quantifiably compare the number of words the Times and other British rags have devoted to Meghan and how much devoted to Prince Andrew, who raped child slaves.

Talk about a tempest in a teapot. When the dust settles its going to land on the palace. I don’t think it will damage the reputations of Mr. and Mrs. Sussex and really just underlines that there was a need for them to get the hell of that dreamed up cage fight which was built by the press, and curiously, egged on by…

An 86 year old dying from a stroke is hardly the smoking gun these anti-vaxxers think it is

To quote a fabulous article about Woody Allen on Roger Ebert’s website:

I'm not taking advice from a guy wearing a blazer over a turtleneck.

Question for you, Emily: if there’s a typo or the wrong word makes it into an article, how would you like to be notified?  I do so much proofreading that it’s second nature to me.  I don’t mean for it to be offensive; I figure you want to fix them.

I see no reason to doubt Shia, not like he’s a known egotist with a history of lying about his own conduct or anything...

Hmmm. After the many, many disappointing instances where actors and directors I love turn out to be pieces of shit (Hi Joss! Hi Johnny!), it’s almost refreshing to have a talentless piece of shit turn out to be a piece of shit. 2021 is indeed a low place.

So this talentless loser is outed, repeatedly, for being a first class ass nugget, and he still keeps convincing women to be with him?

Exactly! And if anyone thinks that Larry Flynt was more of a misogynistic asshole than Jerry Falwell, or any of his ilk, are deluding themselves.
At least Flynt owned up to who he was instead of hiding behind JAYSUS!

Larry Flynt rubbed a lot of people the wrong way (no pun intended).
But despite his personality, he did a lot of fucking good in the world of censorship and right-wing bullshit, and for that I will always admire him.

“Framing Britney Spears” does a really good job of anecdotally showing that Jamie has, from the very beginning of her kiddie modeling/acting days, been very concerned about the financial impact of Britney’s career. On the one hand, they weren’t wealthy and it was expensive to get her up and running, so I understand…