Why would you multiply by 13.5 and divide by 1.5 when you can just multiply by 9?

With a little (bad? nefarious?) luck, you might murder someone with a pacemaker.

Not every tort is negligence. Enjoy the rest of 1L.

I would buy the shit out of that New York Jews hat!

God willing—his boxing stuff’s good, his weight-lifting stuff’s fine, and every other word he’s ever written is unmitigated garbage.

That ducks the question—what would constitute clear and accurate evidence in your eyes? Does the fact that he was armed and had previously fired at police (if true) change what the police’s reaction should have been?

Is there anything that could convince you that that was the case? If you knew that that was the case, would that change anything for you, or are facts secondary to narrative?

He was apparently armed and had fired at police. How should they have removed him and made him submit to handcuffs?

They don’t have IP in their designs, both because there’s no meaningful IP protection for fashion and because they proudly state that they copied traditional designs rather than inventing them.

What should the police have done, in your expert opinion?

Super edgy take, bro. The guy just committed armed robbery and shot at the police, then led them on a 45 minute chase through a major city, but they should have let the “little” person “get away with shit” because he’s not rich enough for your disdain.

Nah

Quick, what’s the capital of Palestine? Who is the head of state? When’s the next election? What other countries recognize it?

Did I miss something, or does that link (at most) argue that the cop who pulled Philando Castile over had a valid reason for doing so? Because if that’s it, that’s a shitty defense for shooting him, and not where I would want to focus attention if I were you.

Tired schtick is tired.

Not sure why I’m bothering with a response—you don’t seem to be interested in an actual discussion—but I’m not (even) using Marxist as an insult here—the word is generally associated with the academic movements (e.g., critical theory) that concern themselves with structural-inequality-type explanations of social…

Thanks, not sure how I could have missed that. Must’ve been those hundreds of millions of Communist murders clouding my vision.

Not sure what’s confusing you—did you not know “[blank] justice” / “[blank]-ist oppression” talk is Marxist? Well, now you know.

Is there a different word Jews should be using? Or should they just be quiet and let the Akkadians speak for once?

Funny that a family of websites that subtly promotes class warfare (always taking labor’s side, bashing the rich, etc.) and echoing Marxist talking points (systemic/oppressive/partiarchal/corporatist/racist/late-capitalist inequality explains everything!) would giggle at the idea of Communist influences in American…