comic-fan
Comic-fan
comic-fan

I wonder how they’re represent popular well-known sites. Will they be locations or actual ‘characters’? Will there be avatars of users roaming around that characters can interact with similar to Tron? Will they just ignore a big ugly section that is never traversed by our Disney characters because it’s the “red-light

Hopefully this is more 5th Element and less Jupiter (I got some vibes of that film as well from the trailer). I loved the wacky humor of 5th Element combined with the brevity of the situations that made it tonally more like a comic book movie than anything I’d ever seen at the time. It even had slapstick humor that

Every episode has entranced me. Sometimes I feel like I’m watching an enthralling western, sometimes a complex science fiction opera. Not to mention so much of the dialogue has multiple levels to it due to the hosts slowly gaining sentience and people having either multiple or unclear motives. Plus all the

I assumed super-strength gave one the ability to jump really high and fast, sort of like the Hulk. But hey, comicbook physics.

Yes. I would argue that the Old Testament is way more patriarchal than the New. The new New Testament does more to sort of ‘buck the trend’ so to speak in a lot of areas including that one, but contextually it was still a very patriarchal society.

I’m simply referring to those ‘concrete’ examples. There are other, much better examples in the old testament that he could have chosen for examples of patriarchy, but instead he chose some really contextually poor New Testament examples.

Contextually, those verses are referring to prostitutes and temple prostitutes who dressed a certain way and kept their hair a certain way. In essense it’s saying it would be wise for a woman to not dress like a prostitute if she’s a Christian. But take away from it whatever you want, I guess.

Also the verse referring

Really, because they acknowledge that it has similarities to a movie that’s existed for 40 years you’re not seeing it? Get over yourself, guy. And don’t see the movie, I guess. Whatever, I don’t care.

I actually read somewhere that the studio execs had actually intended on it being the “last” of the series to end the franchise or whatever. Which was, in my opinion, a terrible idea.

Yep, he tried his best to ruin the X-Men franchise. It took two movies (First Class and Days of Future Past) to correct his mistakes in the franchise and save it.

“the sex was unnecessary.”

Although it would definitely change the pacing of the third act, the first ending in your article makes almost more logistical sense than the actual ending the film got (although to be fair I was fine with the actual ending).

By my own standards and no one else’s.

It’s possible you may be my spirit animal.

Jimmies = rustled

I’m not speaking to that, in fact I like the artwork and looks like it may be good. I was simply responding to someone else’s comment about the film. I actually hope it is good and etc.

If you’re not either on par with the first or bringing something new to the table, then there’s no reason to reboot/remake it. Compared to the first Ghostbusters (which is arguably one of the greatest comedies ever made) it is mediocre.

The difference is Women Terrible Writing and Lack of Respect for the Original Film Ruining The Treasured Childhood Thing, presumably.

I, for one, welcome our new chicken overlords.

We are all Padme on this blessed day.