I feel compelled to leave this here...

But I can’t even get you to read the article in the first place, so let’s not argue.

Yikes. That is crazy!

Well, no, I mean, I didn’t want to point fingers, it’s just that you said things that aren’t accurate per the article itself and I was going to let you discover for yourself first. Yikes man.

In the essence of business, its become more efficient, aka, precise. I don’t doubt that you’re exactly right, but business-model synthesis has become more homogenized by nature, certainly much more than anyone ever had from non-regulated, state-legal potency variances. It’s measurable similar to wine and beer IBU’s.

If it was on-site, maybe. But in this case it would set a new precedent for crazy interpretations of the law. You might be right though, regardless. Touche.

Waiting? Did you read the article?

Several of the things you are basing your opinion on aren’t accurate according to the article itself, though.

No, but that’s not what would happen to this or any event.

Kinda.
Prescription edibles have a much more measured amount of cannibinoids, including THC. In fact, it’s incredibly precise.

Not just different strains, but how they are used. This story is about an edible, and edibles are created in several different ways but the main outlier for effects is temperature. THC is only one of many cannibinoids (the components that contribute to the effect), but it’s the others that have the most…

I get punishing him, but don’t you think a permanent ban on a cancer treatment fundraiser is excessive?

Comparing weed to any other prescription notwithstanding, I just think a permanent ban is too much.

I agree, don’t share prescriptions.

Just to clarify, this was an edible; they didn’t smoke it, they ate it, and that has profoundly different effects. I don’t think a permanent ban makes any sense at all, but I’ve seen daily smokers freak out from edibles. It’s simply not uncommon.

But a permanent ban from a fundraiser like AGDQ? It’s overkill, isn’t it?

Except it pot, know what I mean? Like, a bottle of Tylenol will kill you, no prescription needed. I get the argument, I sincerely do, but objectively it’s still weed. And I even understand punishing him, but a permanent ban on supporting a fundraiser?

I let a friend have a sip of my Merlot.
I was immediately banned from, well, nothing.

Couldn’t he also just get insurance? It’s incredibly easy.

This could be an entire episode of The Highlight Reel...