coloradofx4
Clay...Bill Clay
coloradofx4

110 years is absolutely excessive. Polis should commute some of the sentence and the state legislature needs to change these sentencing laws. I also feel for this guy since he clearly did not intend for any of this to happen and did not have the proper training or experience to be driving in the mountains. But

Not quite the offer some others here are seeing, but 60% of the original purchase price over seven years is pretty good, especially for a very much not in demand sedan. Tempting...

If you account for inflation (and you should), $20k in 2009 is just over $25k today.

I want to find this station in Denver that’s at 3,000 feet. Must be at the bottom of a very deep pit.

I’ve pretty much always put 85 in my Ranger (140k) and never had any sort of issue.  But any sort of modern turbo engine and I’d definitely run 87 or 91.

Cop’s a dirtbag and can’t believe he’s still president of the FOP. Of course this happened in Longtucky.

I’m also partial to the Ranger, but I’ll go 9th gen F-Series here.  An F-150 regular cab 4x4 with the 4.9 I-6 and 5-speed would be awesome.

Can’t agree with the stick shift family sedan more. I have a 6MT Fusion. Is it as good to drive as a Miata? Not even close. But as a dad with responsibilities, the manual turns a rather pedestrian car into something entertaining for real life.

I’m really tempted to sell my ‘14 Fusion 6-speed after getting a really good offer from Carmax. I’m not driving much, and we use the wife’s car most of the time with the kids, but I like the car, it’s in almost-new condition (<50k miles),  and it’s a bit of a rarity being manual-equipped.

Yeah, it’s a bit of a mess.  They should just leave the line item prices of the 2.0L and AWD separate, and absolutely make sure the pricing summary is accurate.

Just to clarify, and Ford’s wording is confusing, the 2.0L engine adds $1,085 to any model.  AWD requires the 2.0L engine, and is bundled together for $3,305.  So it’s not “another” $3,305 on top of $1,085.

I was expecting more than the $8800 Carvana offered for my ‘14 Fusion 6-speed with 49K miles.

Cornering the market on manual ZJs is an interesting investment strategy.

Yep.  I’d post a picture as proof, but Kinja...

It’s no sports sedan, but with the little turbo four and 6-speed makes it a decent drive.  If you have to have a family car (and I do), may as well make it a little more fun.

If we’re talking manual versions of common Fords, the Taurus MT-5 wagon has to be the Holiest of Holy Grails.

I think this one falls outside the typical NP/CP assessment due to its “time capsule” status. Personally, I think it’s important to preserve some run-of-the-mill, throwaway cars, and I derive joy seeing a well maintained old workhorse from 20-30 years ago. Yes, the exotics and muscle cars are important, but the

I love these 9th gen F-150s, and a simple XL with the 300 I6 is attractive, but $7K is just too much. For about the same amount I’m looking at a listing for a ‘92 XLT SuperCab, 83K miles, and the 351 V8. Or for $5K a ‘94 XLT 4x4, 158K miles, and the 302 V8.  Both as clean, if not more so, than this truck.