Won’t this Volvo on MAN Truck violence ever end?

Had a ‘97 Ranger with the Twin-I Beam setup; great suspension aside from slightly more aggressive tire wear. Of course I ruined it in college with an ill-advised 3-inch lift that did not include a drop Pitman arm (no power steering).

I would like to know what Real People (not actors) think of the new ZR2.

Time to unleash the bodicia!

little from A, little from B...

Interesting. I guess it’s high time I did a thorough inspection of my Hermosillo-built Fusion.

3rd: WoooHooo! Can’t wait to start filling up with 92 - dare I say 93 - octane and start experiencing some High Octane Thrillz of my own!

Gotta add people who drive with DRLs at dusk/night. These people are either unaware the full head/taillights aren’t on and are oblivious how to operate a basic safety feature on their car, or figure the 70% power DRLs are good enough, so don’t care the rest of us may not see them until it’s too late.

My 1.6 EcoBoost Fusion recommends 87, so I imagine the 1.0 is the same. Per the owner’s manual:

Damn, only 3 sextillion years for my go-to password.

In addition to the I6, wasn’t the 4.2L V8 also dropped for 1983?

Check out Allen Edmonds for dress shoes. I wear a 13 4E in New Balances, and Allen Edmonds 3E widths fit well.

Oh come on, it’s staring you in the face (courtesy of ffoc02)

Hold on, is that a woodgrain pattern in the paint?

It sounds like some testing has been done in Europe, and the results aren’t great.

Lift kit on a 4x2, 4-cylinder Ranger. Definitely looked a bit better, but the ride was ruined and the steering system got screwed up. The additional weight did nothing to improve the already anemic performance, and with no brake upgrades the stopping distances got quite a bit longer. Oh, and the truck was still an…

except in the case of trucks (which I think tended to look nice in their boxy 1990s form)