I’d say the Japanese were a great competitive power in WWII and they’re not caucasian, either.

Even Mueller’s report - take Barr out of the equation - does not establish Trump committed a crime that could be successfully prosecuted.

If I were to say to you, “I’m receptive to your input”, then it would be akin to a direct invitation. In fact, I think most people would interpret that as a direct invitation.

No, he can define what “receptive” means but whether his definition matches your definition (or mine) is different.

I think Barr’s response to Feinstein made sense. If Trump’s reason for wanting to fire Mueller was because of a conflict (real or imagined) that is different than just saying “Go fire that guy.”

Barr’s summary was accurate.  If you disagree, you can always look at the redacted report and let me know what’s wrong about it.  It was a summary and summarized Mueller’s report accurately.

To me, that makes Taibbi and Greenwald more reputable.  What each wrote is correct.  Just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean it’s false.

If Mueller testifies, do you really think he’s going to say his investigation warranted an indictment against Trump?  If that was Mueller’s conclusion, why would he have not included it in his report?  After all, that was a big part of his investigation.

If he wanted an indictment, he should have stated his investigation revealed a crime committed by POTUS.

The part of the letter you quoted is not a direct refutation of anything by anyone. At best, Mueller relayed that he felt the results of his investigation were not being accurately portrayed, but he never identified whom he felt was in the wrong.

This summarizes the various proposed Amendments advanced in Congress and all of the States basically take the same language and narrow it to the individual State.  

When you’re arguing over which war criminal is better, you’re probably doing something wrong no matter which one you support.

You underestimate the powers the idiots that visit this site place in AOC.  They think she can reverse climate change, cure cancer and make them all straight and happy simply by her thought alone.  They love her.

She didn’t try and build an image as an inconoclast weirdo she is an iconoclast weirdo.

From you a short time ago:

No it isn’t because plenty of people doubted, or at least questioned, this story from the beginning.

Yeah, except for the 15+ pre-election indictments he obtained before Stone’s.

Your “argument” isn’t consistent. You allege Mueller has to keep everything quiet to preserve his credibility even though he hasn’t kept anything quiet to date. You now argue that he can use indictments as “leverage” and make that known far and wide.

He DID release information.  He indicated Trump’s fucking campaign manager and staff.  How is that consistent with your “nonpartisan” angle?

Sorry you can’t figure out how to buy a health insurance policy.  It’s truly simple.