I’ll do my best.

No, the post states that “violent pro-abortion extremists barely exist” and if something “barely” exists it still exists. So, no, the report does not support your assertion that there is “no evidence they exist.”

No, I am not lonely. My day is going well so far.

No, I directly addressed your argument.

Now you misused “literally” which, again, confirms that English is not your first language.  If it is, you need to work on getting your GED.

Again, if you have to ask an truly insipid question like “Do you just auto reply?” it makes me wonder why you have such a difficult time understanding simple, declarative sentences written in English.  The logical answer is that English is not your first, or likely second, language.

The primary argument they rely is that the fetus is alive just as much on day 1 as it is in the last trimester. So, they see all fetuses as living beings that don’t deserve to be “murdered”.

No, it’s a statement expressing my belief you have a poor grasp of English.  That belief has been further confirmed by you apparently being completely unable to understand my simple expression of that belief.

You’ve got my vote.  I’m cool with starting with that crowd.  

In the context of this article, I bet you love the FBI when they enforce FACE Act violations, though, don’t you?

If one of those choices is killing someone that’s innocent, I think a natural response is to extremely oppose it.

You have neglected to address the forced-choicers that were the subject of the FBI’s report.

violent pro-abortion extremists barely exist . . .

So you have new Socialists in reliably-safe Socialist districts.  Quite an accomplishment.

Bullshit. That one study has always been roundly criticized for exactly what I said: It relied on basic assumptions that had no basis in reality. Here’s a simple version I’m sure you can understand.

Ah, I interpreted the “attack ads” comment as being directed at these four particular Congresswomen.  My bad.

What I’m proposing is “active management of our environment.”

. . . but more generally can see this spectacularly backfiring in not only creating easy attack ads against them . . .

If you want to lose the 2020 election, why not just run Hillary again? It would be more fun to see Round 2 of her against Trump. She might even win the re-match.  Don’t lose it by advocating a plan to abolish ICE. Democrats are terminally stupid.

Enforcing existing laws isn’t oppression any more than writing a DUI charge is “oppressive” to drunk drivers. The law is the law is the law.