Hey, what was the name of that guy who tweeted his wiener? Oh, yeah, it was Mr. Weiner.
CoconutTreeIsland
coconuttreeisland
He once attacked Democrats over their effort to give poor kids extra milk at school.
Now I agree with you on all that save for this one thing here:
87 huh.. and a NIGHTMARE freddy...
Gotta give the guy credit - he seems to out a lot of work into the backstory. I’d love Boss Fight Books to do a huge interview/book with the guy, outlining the entire series and it’s various twists and turns.
Man, I love this series. I never beat the second one, but I’ve played them all, and the extent the creator goes to give his fans that sense of mystery and whatnot that they/we love is pretty great. I’ve mentioned it before on other articles, but series like FNaF and the Souls games are showing there really is a good…
Actually, a guy making a game on his own and becoming successful through the help of a community that enjoys his work shows that there is a God. You not enjoying something doesn’t automatically invalidate it nor does it spell the end of gaming. It doesn’t need a billion dollar budget to be justified.
Oh no this is the Final one?!
Five Night’s at Freddy’s V: Dream Warriors
Five Night’s at Freddy’s VI: Freddy vs. Pinhead
Five Night’s at Freddy’s VII: Revelations
Five Night’s at Freddy’s: Origins
And, of course, the obligatory reboot simply titled Freddy.
I sincerely hope the franchise goes to space.
Inhale my dong enragement child?
Last week, people were freaking out about a blank image that they thought might be teasing a new Five Nights game.…
Omg you had to post that.
I still don’t get why Konami fired Kojima. Did they honestly think they’d be in better shape by getting rid of their top celebrity developer?
Perfect summary.
Young people of the world: avoid associating with people who constantly shift goalposts, people who constantly go out of their way to drill new holes into recently fixed dams, and people who constantly view the world in observably & militantly binary terms (projecting a “you’re either 100% with us or…
While panelists can choose to not answer a question, the problem here is (as the GGers even admitted) their goal wasn’t to have a back and forth with the panel, but rather to disrupt it with a line of derailing questions. So choosing to not answer questions would’ve been used as fuel against the panel just as much as…
Why wouldn’t there be? There are always members of oppressed minorities who side with their oppressors. Black and gay republicans, for example.