That's not true at all. The reason the new games won't run is because your hardware is older. It has nothing to do with what version of Android you are using.
That's not true at all. The reason the new games won't run is because your hardware is older. It has nothing to do with what version of Android you are using.
"At the very least, if you can make a call, you have full 911 access."
- The Gizmodo 4S review should have been titled "Why I love the 4S". It wasn't a real review in any way. One of the reasons why it wasn't a real review is that it didn't address how prone the back of the phone was to breaking.
"And know what the favorite iPhone design is amongst many Gizmodo staffers? Not the slim, sleek, machine-like design of the iPhone 4/4S. No, it's the original design with the brushed metal back. No gloss, just pure, unadulterated opacity."
The iPhone 4S review, which ranked out as the best review of the year, was the worst review I can ever remember reading (not just this year).
You left out Google Latitude. The new Apple and Foursquare alternatives shown in the article do what Latitude has been doing for almost 3 years.
"they're going to create a tablet in 6 months that will compete with the iPad?"
You are correct that activation does not require a wireless contract. But subscribing to a wireless service does not require a contract either.
The guy and the chick talk for a while then end up having sex in the bathroom on the plane.
I still have some bookmarks which have the address thefacebook.com. I guess guess I don't update them much.
You could just say 2.2, 2.3 or whatever instead of the food word.
Why would anyone publicly name an OS after large cats? Both food and cats pretty stupid when you think about it.
"What version of Latitude do you mean? Google makes their own apps for iOS...?"
So if she has the purse on her lap and you glance at it....is it a purse with a gun attached or a gun sitting on top of a purse?
I think the simple solution is to prevent passengers from taking double takes to determine if someone has a gun on an airplane. One person might determine it is a fake gun and do nothing. The next person thinks it's a real gun and tackles the woman. Now there is a fight on the plane in the air.
You don't get it. You can't have replicas of weapons on planes. When someone points a gun at you there is no chance for a "decent inspection" to determine if it's a real gun.
"Any idiot could have figured out in 5 seconds of close inspection that it's not a gun, unless it is an actual fully replicated gun that extends into the interior of the bag."
So you're saying they should allow replicas of small guns on airplanes....????
If the TSA has to inspect something to determine if it is a real gun or not then it shouldn't be on the plane. That is the point.