Really? I don’t see it. It looks awkwardly over styled.

When I was a nuclear machinist mate in the Navy, we had things called “backpressure regulator valves.” It’s probably more accurate to refer to them as “upstream pressure regulator valves,” but “backpressure” is easier to say. But my point is that the valve is regulating upstream pressure, so it makes sense to say that…

God forbid we interrupt the 400 posts on the Tesla 3

“Hawking” it on Facebook, unless he’s taking it to a pawn shop or coughing it up like phlegm. What is the point of the clear panel in the hood? I can’t but think that any serious off-roader guys would laugh long and hard at that. Looks much better without the front bumper, though.

Oh, the hockey stick. Yes. Now, how much is mankind responsible for? Scientists are worried about research grants, they will manufacture ANY data to your liking. As long as the money keeps coming in. And that goes for both sides.

Can you please quantify “Climate Change” and how much is mankind responsible for? You can’t, you have no data, climate has been changing for millenia with and without man. It gets warm, it gets cold. get over it and give up your false religion.

Evidence which a lot of sensible people question! Can’t we be skeptical of a theory based on computer models whose predictions have yet been validated by real world data? That’s OK, isn’t it?

Climate change is the trend of the climate in which we live and it’s historical movements. Its existence is not up for debate.

The climate’s been continuously changing on Earth for eons. The fact that current upswings in temperature and CO2 (which are still extremely low by historical standards) is happening during our particular era doesn’t prove a causal relationship with the burning of fossil fuels.

Denying the apocalyptic prognostications of the left on the issue isn’t denying the science - it’s denying the stupidity of the sky is falling.

“unpaid public health costs” is a complete crock. Same argument was used for cigarette taxation. “Think of how much we will save in health costs!” they said. We’re still waiting for those savings. There is also no attempt at a cost/benefit analysis for oil - which would, of course, show that the costs are miniscule…

What is surprising is that Charles and David Koch went to MIT, so you’d thinkthey’d be rational, logical human beings who base their ideas on science and, you know, facts.

Did Gawker sell you or something? You guys aren’t allowed to say nice things about conservatives, let alone Scalia!

“Up to X MPG” is actually a pretty common phrase among car manufacturers. It’s how manufacturers refer to their highway mileage, typically, rather than their combined score. Take Jeep for example;