I hope this is a joke.

lololol i love this story.

I had to look up “negging” because apparently I live under a rock. “It is no wonder no one takes Jezebel seriously” feels very neg-ish.

She is a devout knight of the proletariat.

They sure as hell play a rougher style of Marco Polo down South than they do up here.

Saints fan here. It’s him.

Those ears are STRIKINGLY similar.

Not sure I could love this comrade more.

Meh. Mutual combat. Everyone in this video should be set adrift at sea to better the future of mankind.

I do not feel bad for her at all. It was a big fight going on and if you walk up to someone fist raised you better expect to get hit, woman or not.

You can drop the “alleged.” It’s definitely a video.

As the video starts, the guy in the white shirt with the belt is attacked by several men and women. He defends himself with punches and roundhouse hits with a belt. What is he supposed to do? Stand still and be a punching bag? This is nowhere near Ray Rice territory.

So what piece of shit human being’s piece of shit burner are you? Shall I take guesses? Articulate enough to write in complete sentences, so not some 12-year-old. Understand GM well enough to make a burner. You just, what, had nothing better to do on a Saturday than make a burner and be a misogynist bag of feces?

Gotta protect dem delicate menzes from duh hysterical wimminzes.

Saying a woman or girl has “daddy issues” is fucking wretched. If she has daddy issues, shouldn’t the hate be directed at, you know, her god damned father? How is his disgusting and damaging fuckery her fault?

It really doesnt matter if it was LEGAL appropriation— knowing it was going into a show and knowing that it would be highly publicized (and not just a personal piece that would lie forgotten in his studio, for example) he should have reached out to Sicardi and Smith. It’s just repulsive and in bad taste. Not to…

there;s a huge fucking difference between getting an image for your tumblr manips and AN ART FUCKING SHOW. this dude is full of shit.

It would seem that the gallery proprietor isn’t considering all four factors of fair use.

His behaviour, the piece he produced, or both?

Beyond a lack of ethics it is just pure lazy.