Kinematic range vs high altitude targets does not mean S-400 can engage a fighter at medium altitude 200nmi away.

Overall rating? That’s pretty meaningless...

493rd deployed 6 Eagles there a month or two ago.

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Glorious HD photos of crashes? OK.

Hah!

No clue, Googled “Su-27 crashes” and found that out of a lot of disturbing pictures...

Its a former East German MiG-29A, when Germany unified they kept the Fulcrums around until 2003 or so. The MiG-29 was designed long before the wall came down (1970s) and entered production in 83 or 84, IIRC.

>Su-34 >BFMing an F-16 >winning

hahaha

But this huge jet with shit missiles is so cool man, must be better than F-16.

Inb4 “Fox 3 close”

Do you even Viggen?

Hah.

They are under 30,000ft, AFAIK.

Uhhhh...

Depends on what you mean by better, increasing thrust on burner is already being done (they’ve tuned it up to 50k supposedly, and that’s installed thrust from what I’ve heard).

RIP RQ-170.

That is the best name for an AAM, ever.