I know Arnold is in this, but does Bill Paxton return as an aging street-punk?
I know Arnold is in this, but does Bill Paxton return as an aging street-punk?
Well, yeah, I was being lazy. My point was that Wizard of Oz, being on film, was ALWAYS in high definition and always looked stage-y on a big screen.
It looked fakey in the theater back then, too.
35 mm film is essentially the resolution of HD. What the Wizard of Oz looks like in theaters is what The Wizard of Oz looks like in theaters. It's not HD's fault. Wizard of Oz has always looked fake-y and stage-y on the big screen. That's just it's aesthetic.
Random guy on Tinder.
The David Bowie one looks like skin cancer with eyes.
He would have been an interesting choice for Khan in Star Trek Into Darkness.
Ripley and Hicks adopted little Newt, and they bought a lovely little farm with the enormous hush-money settlement they got from Weyland-Yutani. Bishop comes and visits sometimes. Ripley has taken up baking, and her pies have won prizes. Hicks competes in chili cook-offs. They are content and happy, and they never go…
That's crazy talk. There was no Alien III.
Twisted and eee-vill.
Maybe you can get a copy of this movie and intercut it with the Space:1999 pilot. I'd totally watch that if you posted it on Youtube.
Me too.
Thank you. That was bugging me, too.
I had that comic!
No one is going to give the guy who made Dune a bunch of money to fuck up a big expensive sci-fi epic.
So it would seem.
When New Yorkers start their pizza dick waving, I always enjoy pointing out that you can get as good a pizza at some random Florida strip-mall pizzeria as you can in New York. Florida is full of pizza places run by old New York pizza makers who got bored in retirement.
Your lawyer introduces that as Defense Exhibit A, and no jury in the land would convict you.
Indiana is worse.
It's a callback to the armored fighting suit he wore fighting Superman in the 80s Dark Knight comic. It looks like this movie is lifting a lot of visual cues from that comic.