cleganebowlconfirmed
CleganeBowlConfirmed
cleganebowlconfirmed

No, but they sell products knowing that they will be used in a dangerous manner. Should that lead to liability? There’s arguments both ways, and I don’t want to get into them. The point is that there are significant similarities between that and Tesla’s autopilot should severe accidents continue to happen because

For sure. I think what he meant was “so they won’t get fucked.” It’s a pretty good system to limit liability, tbh. I don’t see this being a big problem for Tesla unless a few more dangerous accidents happen. At some point, they’re enabling people to be reckless with full knowledge of the potential risks. If they know

tbh, I don’t foresee much of a problem for Tesla even in your hypothetical.

No. 3 was clearly the best.

This guy’s biggest crime was fucking up the law on 12(b)(6) motions in Federal Court.

I asked questions because I didn’t know and commented that if I was not wrong (I was), then OP was wrong. Literally my entire post could not be more right. I didn’t say OP was wrong at any point in time—only that he would be wrong if my civilian interpretation of the term was correct. It wasn't. Learned something

But he was trying to shoot down the machine and the machine was trying to shoot him down...in the simulation, yes. I’m confused. How is that not a dogfight? Is that a term of art that has a more narrow meaning than plane on plane action in the air?

It finally dawned on me. All takes do, in fact, matter.

Why are they calling it “Speak for yourself” in those tweets?

I’ve gone away from planning out meals. I plan out my macros and buy foods that are as high in protein as possible while minimizing the fat and carbs. I try to get 40% of my calories from protein, 30% from Carbs and 30% from fat everyday. This works for me. It’s flexible. I find that focusing on protein content is the

Which is the ENTIRE point. Your politics and social views will influence what you do without you trying. There is a huge difference between that and actively trying to put your politics out there. Schefter is against the latter when it comes to people that report on sports. The former is unavoidable—one literally

Plus, there is not a chance in hell that ankle roll is a “I’ll be on crutches for 6 weeks” variety. I say he’s hatched some sort of plan to get out of some work and this is part of his master stroke. You’ve been played, Ley.

For what it’s worth, Barry was the first person to star my comment. I’m not sure why, but apparently we have some common ground that I did not expect based on this write up.

This is a pedantic take, at best. OF COURSE politics is relatable to just about everything in some way. Even though the tweets you mention have some connection to larger political issues, I would never call them “political” tweets—not even close. I take Schefter’s view as being against actively engaging in political

It’s gotta me Manziel himself. I completely buy that he would make a Kinja account just to troll the comment sections on articles relating to himself.

Counterpoint: no.

This is such a blatantly false statement...Where do you people get this stuff? Honestly. Whoever or wherever you got this idea from, let me fill you in on something: it is fabricated bullshit that exists ONLY to lend support to some ideal of how society should change. It is not grounded in fact in any way. Our

It's among the worst ways to see red too.

....international basketball DIDN’T catch up. We sent scrubs for a few years and then went back to sending the best. There is only ONE other team on the planet that has hope against the US in basketball—Spain. And they still do not have much. That is, in no way shape or form, “catching up.”

That’s the problem. There aren’t enough American fans that are willing to wait around for this gap to be closed. We’d rather watch football, basketball, hockey, and baseball. Well maybe not baseball, but you get the point. American soccer will have to grow without the level of support that the early NBA and NFL