Can we all agree that “Anti-Aging” clinics are just a fresh way to get designer drugs? I mean looking back at it all now, between the Balco, that MLB report that had all the dopers names, that shady Florida clinic that A-Rod went to (Go Yanks), and now this. The common denominator is sleazy anti-aging or health…

If even half of this is true, then right now I kinda hope that Luke Kuechly breaks his fucking spine on Sunday.

Leave Sly and the family alone.

I think the point is that you looked into Fleming’s story because there appeared to be no corroboration (good), but when you found corroboration that more or less matched Fleming’s story, you still ran with the “his story is fishy” angle, even though it was no longer fishy. It feels like you wrote this story with a…

I think the point is it doesn’t matter if he’s lying about a wreck or not. It literally helps or hurts nobody and you’ve wasted precious time in your life “reporting” this

You're a cock regardless, Marchman.

Gotta agree with Marchman here, there’s literally no difference between being skeptical about a story and running a story painting a guy as a lying sack of shit. That’s journalism 101 bro, duh.

Oh, good job running it down. No doubt about that. But once it checked out, is it really news?

It is an odd choice to run a story of which the basis is, “I am not sure we should believe this story,” when the story in question has been confirmed. That was his point.

One would think you’d read and digest a comment before defending yourself:

So you are reporting on others who are currently, actively, reporting. Also you’d like some help with your own reporting and you’re going to let us know if you’re allowed to use a credit card.

“I was told that we could get a copy if we provided a $5 check and then we could get a copy of the report in the mail. I’m not in Boston”

Engaging defensively in the comments makes you look, well, defensive.

He obviously doesn’t know how litigious Peter King gets when someone encroaches on his trademark.

The whole article paints a story that his tale didn’t have legs because all the cops, fire dept, and dunkin donuts (the fuck?) didn’t report any accident.

The issue I see is that you haven’t proved that he did or didn’t heroically help in a car crash, so this story doesn’t yet have a point. If he lied, then establish that he lied and print that. If he did help with a crash, then find the truth there and post that. Instead, your story is “We’re mid-way writing a story,…

Pretty sure hes saying that its weird to run with a story once you have confirmed that there is no story and to change said story into how you confirmed said story was in fact, not a story.

Journalistic integrity is defined as never believing anything the Patriots say.

A quick google maps search shows that Foxhill Drive is about a block north of a Dunkin’s.

Hey guys, good job. You did exhaustive research trying to prove this guy to be a liar, but came up short. Alas, you ran with the pointless story anyway.