Oh for fucks’ sake, get over it. Complain all you want, but Jeff George isn’t going to come out of retirement. End of story.

Plenty of people in the US don’t think ADHD is real either.

“So it’s not real? “No.” he responded.

Wow you people really don’t like him, do you?

Yeah, I didn’t get the headline either. Since he is saying he didn’t do it, he discussed it, and there isn’t a lot more you would expect him to say.

The woman who first told the story as a blind item has said it was not Louis CK. Another comic, Doug Stanhope, came forward and said it was him, not Louis CK. So why is he still being tarred with this brush? I’m sure he’s not without faults, but it’s been pretty much verified that this isn’t one of them.

Isn’t him saying...

“So it’s not real? “No.” he responded. “They’re rumors, that’s all that is.””

The unfortunate problem is these people increasingly have real estate in the minds of people who do matter. Even the most vapid, unsupported accusation of sexist or racist thinking can reach the ears of a workplace HR department and sink a promising career because you’re suddenly too much of a risk.

It would be called “advice.” Lifehacks are a specific category of advice aimed at cumulatively increasing your efficiency, typically through clever or atypical means.

I and all my co-workers manage to get respect without resorting to pigeonholing confrontations into sexist tropes.

If you “explain,” question, or criticize anything, and the person on the other end of the conversation is a woman, they are apparently free to label it as mansplaining and make the problem all your fault. Of course, don’t you dare explain how it’s a legitimate explanation and not mansplaining because any expression…

As a white male, I recognize that I basically have the best possible hand in life (categorically, at least), but I can’t help but wonder if all the people using “whippipo” and “bernieBros,” etc. are essentially the same as the dickhead white males who run things now.

I have literally been told a few times that it’s literally any time a man explains something to a woman.

NoooOOOO!!! Mansplaining means whatever the author needs it to mean for that day’s articles. Asking people to get their terms straight anymore is an exercise in futility because fee fees...

Everything owned by Gawker has gone to 100% racist, bias, hypocritical bullshit.

Now it’s just Jezebel 2.0

I don’t think it’s mansplaining if you actually understand the topic better than the person you’re speaking with.

He isn’t even explaining something, he’s trying to have a discussion on the topic.

So any valid argument is mansplaining now?

It’s a feedback loop. They can call someone for mansplaining and if the man does ANYTHING other than politely accept the accusation, they are then further guilty of mansplaining. It’s a tactic to control the interaction. The example above is simply patronizing condescension and happens all the time to men/women by men…