I’m of the view there’s no appropriate time to release a film like this and maybe we can stop making films that pedal the fantasy that any teenage girl would be interested in gross older guys altogether. The fantasy is entirely ONE-SIDED.
I’m of the view there’s no appropriate time to release a film like this and maybe we can stop making films that pedal the fantasy that any teenage girl would be interested in gross older guys altogether. The fantasy is entirely ONE-SIDED.
I don’t think you have the first clue about the first amendment personally. The “they” you are talking about regarding the first amendment is the government. Private institutions have absolute discretion and standards of what can be displayed on their properties. They can’t be arrested, detained or affected by the…
1) They are a private space as well as a public body. That gives them many of the legal distinctions and allowances towards restrictions of speech that the distinction entails.
It is a private space even if as a public institution and thereby subject to greater restrictions.
>They don’t have a choice in the matter. They have to ban all posters or none.
And here are multiple University policies that would allow the banning and removal of said material
And to add to the charge of talking out his arse I add the student code of conduct policy subsection C:
Thanks for posting that, since so many people seem to have a hard time with the First Amendment, including another poster up there who began their own comment with “I don’t see how people have such a hard time with the First Amendment.”
It’s trolling from right wing edgelording idiots. They know it’s as ridiculous as it sounds, because it’s all a game to them.
At this point, it’s probably the name of an actual company because our reality has devolved into a Verhoevenian satire.
I think you make a really interesting point, and it reflects a lot of the criticism in this piece about her lack of authenticity. She doesn’t *actually* stand for anything; she’ll just defend whatever party line she has to to make a buck. Like, if she really did give a shit about conservative values, that’s something…
YES! Because she has contempt for the people she’s supposed to be entertaining. I’ve been reading about this car wreck of a show trying to pinpoint the issue and you’ve nailed it.
I’ll be honest; I don’t read her as a misanthrope, as that would require paying attention to other people. She’s said that she’s not anti-anything, but will argue whatever point she’s been given to argue, and I think that’s actually a fairly accurate and self-aware statement on her part. I think the only “ism” that…
Megan Kelly on The Today Show, which my grandfather, who fought in WWII, used to watch, makes me want to barf.
It’s Ivana’s book but Ivanka wrote those parts herself—or is claiming to have written something she had ghostwritten for her and presumably approved. So it’s valid to criticize her, and not for having done typical dumb teenage things, but for writing obvious self-serving horseshit about having done them in some weird…
Because no one has been writing about Malia’s Weinstein Company internship recently. And no one picked apart their fashion as they were going through their teen years.
the point is, this is 35-year-old Ivanka talking about 14-year-old Ivanka, and obviously lying. The point is, 35-year-old Ivanka lies.
They don’t care or can’t believe it. I work among them every day. When I bring crap like this up(I pick my time and am casual and non-accusatory, btw), they just dismiss it: he can do no wrong. These aren’t stupid people, either: in our field stupidity gets you maimed. They just can’t accept anything positive about…