Why is it narrated by a 14-year-old American boy?
Why is it narrated by a 14-year-old American boy?
To be fair, white women haven’t helped recently either.
They should have forfeited the game for assaulting the ref.
+1
I’d love to see Friday adapted. With the rapey bits excised, obviously. But the rest is a pretty good drama and some decent world-building.
Take my money!!
When is somebody going to adapt Gemmell?? So much untapped potential.
Even Heinlein’s adult novels were, in essence, juveniles.
I think you took that badly out of context. Smith is engaging freely in same-sex shenanigans by the end of the book.
But that reason doesn’t make much sense either. Look, Louise, by the end, is able to untether herself from time and see all her timeline as one. But there’s no suggestion she can see into the future after her own death, or into the past before she was born - she’s just seeing her whole life non-linearly. Fair enough.…
Deliberate mischaracterisation.
Why? They must realize that a small-government agenda will effect them negatively?
Speak for your own country pal.
Terrorist!
People did vote for her, the majority of those who could be bothered. Nobody’s to blame for Trump winning other than people who voted for him. It’s not like it isn’t obvious what kind of man he is, but they voted for him anyway, for reasons that include spite, envy, fear of the other, tribalism and sheer…
Exactly so. The point was for Lousie to learn the language, not for them to communicate.
If there’s a point here, it’s buried deep.
There are eleven players in cricket, so once the tenth batsman is out, end of innings.
They’re usually scrutinized to the nth degree. Cricket uses video playback, ball tracking (Hawk-eye), sound analysis (snicko), and even thermal tracking (hotspot).
Q. Does it ever happen where the runner will dive to extend his bat across the line faster?