At this point the "old Pathfinder" is that blobby CUV they have been selling for a while. I do think a CUV based on the recently updated Frontier would be neat - someone has to compete with the 4Runner - but your problems with Nissan can't be fixed with a facelift.

As a completely incompetent CEO I’m surprised Spanfeller isn’t trying to hop on the NFT train. After all, it’s a product for idiots who want to get rich off of stuff while also not knowing or understanding what it is they're supposedly used for, and Spanfeller fits that profile.

I should add that NFTs also don’t enable items to grow and stats to be raised because they are a receipt, not an item. So using NFTs to have an item that grows as you use it actually IS impossible. It being a glorified receipt means the only thing that transfers is the acknowledgement that you have whatever it happens…

And then she breaks a hip when she falls trying to get into it.

As other people have said, you don’t need 4wd. However, it’s a Jeep. I’ll compare it to a Rolex Submariner. You don’t need a watch that is water resistant to 300m. The majority of people who buy Submariners aren’t diving to 300m. Hell I bet the majority of them don't even touch the water. But that’s still an integral…

Even if you could do it, it would work way more efficiently if they just used existing systems. Like let’s say Square decides to make Cloud’s New Hat an item. They could do it, though not without expense - every team, as you said, would need to make their own version of Cloud’s New Hat, since standardizing the asset…

One thing listed that I don’t see which is very important: something large and reflective, like a collapsible yield sign like I've seen a few cars have. Visibility is bad in these situations, the more ways for people to see where the hell you are, the better, and you don't want to rely on batteries too much. I can't…

Thank you, I definitely wasn’t sure but that shirt and that pose didn’t help at all.

It’s a Cavalier, they were like that on the lot.

From the pictures he appears to be missing an arm, though I don’t have other confirmation.

I’m not sure what is so confusing?

I don’t think auteur theory is necessarily silly - the person in charge of a creative project tends to mold it to their vision, even with a ton of collaborators underneath them. Of course, it can be misplaced - the director of an episode of television doesn’t do much to define a series - that’s usually the showrunner -…

“We were able to reach a deal with this publisher.”

Ken Levine looks like that one guy from Impractical Jokers.

It is not a real title. No rights transferred, for one. And while you can trace it, you can’t confirm legitimacy. You might be selling an asset you don't have permission to sell.

It doesn’t show you are the official owner of the object it links to. It shows you are the official owner of itself. It’s a fraudulent title to the Brooklyn Bridge - you don’t have rights, you don’t have something special, you don’t have any actual claim to the object in the link - which might be down anyway. Just as…

I did see a guy go “you just need to standardize the assets!” which has convinced me this is the first time most NFT bros have ever interacted with technology.

Yes, because this is a pointless and inefficient layer of abstraction on top of that thing they can already do more effectively.

They have no capabilities. They’re a glorified receipt and a scam. Every time I read about them all I see is a way to make things we already do significantly worse, and less efficient. The decentralization is completely irrelevant because they only work when pointing to centralized services.