Everybody is SO different, take other people's experiences with antidepressants with a grain of salt. I take 30 mg of Celexa a day and am probably heavier than I would be naturally, but it's worth it. To each their own.

Sometimes I wish we weren't dependant on an old ass document created by people who owned human beings as property for our ethical decisions.

I don't think this is comparable to FGM, don't think feminists hate men (most actual feminists don't find this kind of thing funny in my experience), and know misandry isn't a thing just think people laughing at someone being mutilated means those people are shitty. That's all.

Look, can we just call everyone an asshole?

I hate the fake-celiac sufferers as much as the next anonymous internet person, but asking someone to describe their disease before you take them seriously makes you an asshole. Do not do this.

Yes, why is it so difficult to believe that someone might actually have a real sensitivity to a food item and try to avoid it?

No, because Celiac's isn't the only way you are "allergic to gluten." You can be allergic or intolerant of gluten without having Celiac's. It may not be an allergy that is as fast acting as gluten, but those people are still within their right to avoid it in their meal.

I wish people would just stop being a dick about this. People have sensitivities to different things and when they choose to suffer through it for your benefit, or because they have to choose between two allergies or intolerances, don't jump up and down and be all "HA I knew you weren't REALLY allergic!!!"

It's an open secret that Coulter is a professional shock jockey who believes barely a single iota of what she says in public. Many of her friends are liberal and she' supposedly a cool person in private.

Yeah, I don't feel like blaming him any more than I feel like blaming the victims for keeping quiet. I wish he had spoken up earlier, but who knows if he'd be believed.

(Sounds like those women probably would have appreciated that outspoken pity in 1990, but, HEY, better late than never.)

She didn't become anything resembling a computer engineer, though. Imagine this analogy.

I think what they were trying to go for was to show that people in IT are friendly and willing to help you if you make a mistake from a lack of experience or something.

A few years back (before I had children, and was an A cup), I remembering being told they had NO non pushup bras for A-cups, and they seemed shocked that someone with such inadequate beasts would not be trying to enhance them.

Issue marked Working As Designed. Issue Closed.

Apple didn't make the last $129 million loan payment and then demanded repayment of the $439 million it had lent to GTAT. Very few companies could survive that swing, but lets not say that Apple isn't at least partially responsible here. The agreement was bad for both companies.

Seriously? That's the conclusion you came to out of all of this? That APPLE is the one in the tough spot? Not that Apple's decisions directly bankrupted a supplier, cost however many jobs, vaporized billions in equity value for shareholders, etc. etc.?

If you leave a voicemail, I'll listen and respond. No voicemail, I assume you butt-dialed me and I won't call back.

In general, if someone wants to talk to me and I don't know their number, they better leave a VM or I will ignore the call. If it isn't important enough for you to leave a message, it isn't important enough for me to call you back.

I always thought it was pretty simple: if it's important, leave a voicemail. If you're just calling to chat, no voicemail is needed.