4. NEVER gonna happen, and would actually be worse anyway. Consider how many factories would have to be built to supply everything locally. And then there’s food. The entire world is not comprised of arable land.

Gotta start somewhere, right?

That’s what a Panamera is for.

Let me get his straight. You want to ban fossil fuels for electricity production, long distance cargo, and air travel just so you can still have a car that makes explodey noises?

What segment are you referring to? Car-based trucks have been around since at least the 50's, and Ford even had a unibody truck as far back as 1961, 17 years before the Subaru Brat.

What a coincidence, I hate Elon running Tesla too.

“...that’s bad...”

Yeah, but in this case, you can use the excavator to refill the hole!!!

One is basically a Golf, which is good. The other is a Murano, which is bad.

Oops. I read read the OP as “sells [for] a mere fraction.”

They can file for it, but that doesn’t mean they’ll get it.

Sadly, no plug option on those (yet).

Even longer with the optional 180 KWh battery.

Let hope it runs better...

It’s twice the vehicle as the Escalade, GLS, Range Rover etc that it competes with but sells a mere fraction.

I believe the rotor shape is based on the Reuleaux triangle.

To be fair, the Nissan failed, not because of the general concept behind it, but because their hybrid system (which was supposed to drive the rear wheels) never worked.

I have no patience people this stupid. Why the hood? Just use the roof where you can still see while driving..

Technically this shape (a rectangle with semicircles on opposite sides) is known as a discorectangle, obround, or stadium, which is a type of oval.

It’s probably just for show on the concept car but in reality there is nothing illegal about suicide doors. Rolls Royce uses them, Hyundai’s Veloster has one for the passenger side rear, even Lincoln did a limited run of the Continental recently with them in the back. Part of the reason you rarely see them is that…