Ha. Okay. I’m sorry. I thought you actually wanted to engage is a thoughtful conversation. I’ll stop now.

Learn what? That without any evidence other than her testimony and the contradictory evidence on the other side, she’s probably going to lose? You can think that’s wrong, but it’s reality.

I think I acknowledged there may be legitimate reasons for what she did when I said, “While there may be legitimate reasons for all of that...”. I’m sorry if I wasn’t clear enough about the fact that I think what she did can be very reasonably explained. But I think it can very reasonably be explained. But in court,…

And you may be right. But you’re also choosing to believe her story 100%. A judge is likely going to require more evidence than that, especially when her story has been inconsistent. I’m an attorney and when your client testifies under oath to the exact opposite of what they’re now claiming, it’s usually really bad…

I’m not saying he’s a good guy and not a creep. I have no idea if he is or isn’t. She may be telling the truth 100% or lying about everything to renegotiate her deal. I’m simply saying that post-2005, she had options and did not exercise them. And then, when put under oath and asked what happened, she said nothing…

You appear to be correct. Although, the NYT says that in 2008 and 2009, her contract with Dr. Luke’s company was amended when he got her a deal with RCA. So, she agreed to sign the amendments, but it does not appear was ever free from the 2005 contract.

I didn’t say he didn’t want to keep working with her after 2005. I said he doesn’t want to work with her now. He’s not arguing that he should still be working with her.

I’m sorry. But that’s not correct. At least not according to an article posted by this very website.

He doesn’t want to continue working with her. His attorneys have argued that she is free to work with anyone else at Sony. He just wants to protect his contractual right to the profits off the music she makes.

Unfortunately for Kesha, she had multiple opportunities to address this throughout the years and didn’t. Not reporting it, signing with him a second time, continuing to work with him, testifying under oath it didn’t happen. I haven’t even seen any indication that she reported it to Sony and asked to work with another…

Throughout your replies, you have shown, in my opinion, a fundamental lack of understanding of the law and of business. You keep making claims about how the law and business work in the real world but the basis for your argument is that we should ignore the real world consequences of not enforcing the law, just to…