You gotta admire his spunk, though.
Sorry dear, if she indeed “pleaded with him” not to go through with the shooting, that has nothing to do with cause and effect. That means she knew he was planning to do something and that it was something he shouldn’t do. So unless part of her learning disability involves sudden amnesia, I don’t buy it.
I’m being slightly facetious, but I can’t imagine too many scenerios where having a learning disorder interferes with knowing right from wrong.
If she knew what he was planning, she’s complicit. I have a learning disability. I didn’t know it absolved me of accessory to murder.
No. You don’t get to pull this. Take some responsibility for the shit you do.
“There is a family on my street. . . “
“They just looked unhappy and sad and again in the blue dresses, and I’ve been telling my husband for years something isn’t right, something isn’t right.”
Doubtful, especially since the creepy dad claims he searched the internet to make sure it was legal to sell his underage daughter. I’m thinking they may not have been the most faithful Amish.
You guys like doing this in the comments of stories like this, and while I appreciate your ideological purity, I don’t legally get to call things rape when no one is, as yet, being charged with rape. The woman involved has said the encounters were consensual — although we can argue about that too, because, my God,…
why do we cling to a fantasy where celebs have to be Besties? Some people just don’t get along. It’s fine.
I’m going to guess that it’s just swollen because someone at the party did some free amateur “rhinoplasty” on him while they were waiting for the cops.
Before we pile on, are we sure this guy doesn’t have special needs?
I explained it to a man one time who made the same comparison. FGM is the equivalent of slicing off the entire head of the penis. FGM is done to remove sexual desire, circumcision isn’t.
Reading the comments on another forum (bad move), and there are so many dumbasses pulling a “b-b-b-but MALE CIRCUMCISION” argument, as if it’s remotely equivocal. I tried to explain how it’s far more damaging (and that the reasons for it are far different), but the poor persecuted mens refuse to acknowledge it.
Heavens forfend someone criticize a Third World culture...
If you’re culture routinely mutilates women to stop their sexual desires then your culture is, at it’s core, inferior and barbaric.
Please don’t use the word “circumcised” - it’s the word they want you to use to disguise that this is in no way related to male circumcision.