Is this not what we deserve when we ask our federal elected officials to make health care decisions for us? Half of the time those officials will be folks who have ideas we absolutely despise.

Does it make sense to fire your weapon at someone who tries to take it?

So you want the thugs like Trump and Sessions can have control over all the cops?

Mendoza will never have the same effect in the booth as a former MLB player, but she fits with ESPN’s new diverse identity they are trying to portray, so she may be sticking around for a while.

I will say between Boone, Braden, and Perez, ESPN picked the right one to stick around.

It’s wrong to segregate based on both sex and gender, correct?

I’d like to have a word with NCAA on differentiating sports between Men and Women.

There are conservatives that think conservatism means Constitutional principles... as in conserving the Constitution. Don’t make the name bad for everybody.

Depends what conservative means to those people. Conservative to me means conserving Constitutional principles expressed at the nation’s founding. Being a social conservative can still be consistent with libertarianism in that case.

Yeah, more like Lose-Lose on this one. Left wants the state to force penises and vaginas to shower together. Right wants the state to force penises and vaginas to shower apart. Why don’t you just let the penises and vaginas do what they want on their own terms?

Worse for the environment...
Oil in the pipe?
or
Trash littered across the ground?

When Americans request that Government handle healthcare, this is what you get folks. Politicians from right and left end up making the decisions for you.

What you want to pay them to cover instead of paying for things you don’t want?

you missed the equally batshit “We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it” -Nancy Pelosi

That occurs today, but it’s not going to help long-term if the federal government is ever in opposition to your state and looking to upend that state’s legislative priorities.
Reducing the power of the federal government does not require wholesale destruction, it only requires respect for federalism and each states’…

I’ve got a great solution to everyone freaked out by the current government... Join the states rights movement to restore federalism and each state’s ability to govern themselves without intrusion of the federal government.
It prevents the pendulum effect of presidential elections being so vital for control. With…

That 4K TV tells me where his possible first month’s rent for a REAL apartment went.

Where does the President get the authority to designate National Monuments at his will? Isn’t this a Legislative duty? God forbid Trump have that kind of ability.

The court system exists in areas where people in one jurisdiction are adversely affected by another. And transferring power not delegated to the feds by the constitution back to the states does not affect an already free people from interacting in the global economy.

Agree, states individually can’t do much about federal overreach, but people living in those states can elect congressmen and presidents who do.

Also, national security is a federal defense issue, actually granted to it by the constitution. The surveillance state is obviously a gross expansion of said power though in…

Doesn’t matter who this lady is in particular. It’s about this kind of view...

It’s morally reprehensible to say parents are unable to parent their children as they see fit. I certainly wouldn’t want a government run by Trump or anybody to tell me how raise my minor children.