I stand corrected.

Braking mostly. Increasing downforce on the rear allows you to shift your brake bias further back without locking the rear end up. And you can use it to balance out downforce from the front splitter. There is also some straight line stability improvement from it. You're limited in what you can do, though, because…

On the back of a FWD car. To help insure that even less power makes it to the drive wheels when accelerating through a corner.

The plague of crossovers make an awful lot more sense that the tsunami of full-sized SUVs we had in the 90s, when all people wanted were different options in the wagon/minivan segment, not truck chassis and hauling capacity.

You certainly make a good case for not buying a new car. Your argument against financing, however, is much weaker.

You're right. It's none of my business how you're filling your time.

This is hogwash. There is no way to distinguish what program is generating traffic on a device like this.

Everyone always says that about Foster's, which begs the question why hasn't Australia successfully exported whatever it is that people actually do drink?

This is what you do with your time? You just fritter it away?

Isn't the fact that the concept was built around the Beach House song relevant. It's not just a similar song, it's a soundalike ordered to replace what they couldn't buy. If that history weren't already in place, the agency might have had an easier case.

Cockpit design patent, huh? That doesn't ring true. Maybe the polish patent system is different, but most places only novel methods are patentable. A cockpit layout might be protected under other parts of IP law, but isn't likely patentable.

9 times out of 10, when you wait a very long time for something and it still hasn't arrived, it's because the person responsible for placing the order couldn't be bothered to do it.