chriswhotakesphotos
chriswhotakesphotos
chriswhotakesphotos

In the scheme of high-end consumerism, it’s really not so bad. $185k cars hide in plain sight all the time; any of the completely identical Cayennes, Panameras, Mercedes ML-whatevers or 911s you’ve seen today could have cost that much or more, and you’d only know if you bothered to inspect the badges.

There will be estranged wailing if I can’t have Jigglypuff.

It’s unreasonably gorgeous in person. I’ve seen two, and was just as amazed by how great they look as I was that they weren’t on fire.

The perspective is weird, but this being out of focus has it look more like that metal thing is holding it out in front of the passenger’s face

I appreciate that you write these. Between this and what you told me about the 996, I’m learning all sorts of things about cars I could definitely end up buying sometime.

PLEASE. The Veloster seems so perfectly-suited to this. The whole thing begs for the engine to be here.

Omg these pictures are cool

Finally, a supercar with crazy eyes.

What if it had...an actual spare tire?

D'you know where I'd go to volunteer my civic service here? Mine is the base engine which I'm sure will be preferred since the Ferrari is also naturally aspirated

And I happen to have a Veloster! What's this guy's phone number?

I think needing to look tough is the problem with trucks; that's why you see so many with stax, bro

Why wouldn't you be able to do this with a V10? ACTUALLY MAYBE I SHOULD READ THE ARTICLEF IRST

Now the only recourse is to put the engine in a Veloster.

It's nice to see those Honda kids doing well

Are you sure that's not a Tim & Eric video?

Ah yes, just in case you happened to miss the speedbump with the front of the car.

Perfection

It looks like a grimacing Transformer

How about an AMG Ute? Imagine the drifts!