Technically this isn’t a “rollback” as the regulation was never implemented. A federal judge blocked it back in October.

“One that could have been overcome had they run a better candidate.”

Or maybe a large portion of this country just doesn’t like Hillary.

Hillary would have had a very difficult time trying to be a “change” candidate. She has been in DC too long and was a part of the current administration for four years. No one would have bought it.

You do realize you just described Jim Crow laws, right?

Not to mention their operating expenses were massive $4.5 billion last year (Yale’s was $3.2 billion, for perspective).

I’d like to think it’s possible to care about racial injustice while at the same time not caring what Colin Kaepernick does/doesn’t do.

Maybe instead we should be teaching kindergartners if you throw a pie in someone’s face, you might get your ass whooped.

Oh. Did throwing a pie at his face fix all of that?

My assumption is this exception exists because otherwise the offense could run a play (on a down other than 4th), and if it doesn’t work as intended, draw an intentional grounding penalty and get another attempt at it.

Her children’s lives are certainly worth more than $15,000 a piece, I don’t think anyone is arguing otherwise.

You have a point that her life has been permanently and significantly altered, but you are forgetting that Cinemark was not liable for this woman’s injuries. She turned down $30,000 from a company that was not at fault, presumably because it was not enough for her, which looks suspiciously like greed to a lot of…

I believe they are being called greedy because the one plaintiff turned down $30,000 from a company that was not liable for her injuries (which had already been established in state court), likely because she thought she could get more money. That seems to fit the definition of “greed” pretty well.

It’s anything but unrestricted. The government creates incentives for their purchase and so far the FDA has prevented any other entrants into the market. It’s literally a monopoly created by the government.

It’s a reference to 1984.

He was arrested for being in possession of a “hoax bomb” which is illegal in Texas. He also plugged the damn thing in, and intentionally set the alarm to go off in class, purposefully causing a disruption. That was the point at which he got into trouble. There was never really any confusion about whether or not it was…

Molitor is blocking release of the video, not Mixon.

Nowhere in the article does it state that people are being banned for no reason.

Also, getting Dion Waiters to play an actual supporting role, instead of whatever the hell he was trying to do before, is a pretty impressive feat.

My guess is because it gets over 100 degrees pretty frequently in July and August.