chris209
chris209
chris209

Looks at photo. Sees same Lexus(tm) grill. Moves on.

Came here to post the GS F. Glad to see at least someone on staff appreciates just how amazingly good that car actually is; flaws and all.

I love when you read about a mother who has better taste in cars than their sons. Anyways i think a Kia Stinger will do her perfectly

This has a shot at being the least-shit collection of responses to “What Car Should You Buy?” in the history of this bit.

You know this is a criticism of their marketing and not the overall safety of the car, right? Well, that and a criticism of being defiant when it comes to regulators, which is an objectively stupid practice. The feds can literally prevent you from selling your only real product. That is going to burn them one day -

Diesel as mentioned is a proper Dungeons and Dragons playing nerd, so him bringing unnecessary math to a fake-fight is the reverse of fragile ego, and what’s earned him a game with Matt Mercer.

Honestly don’t know why this vehicle is even relevant anymore.  For $90k you get 10 year old technology, dated interior, dated exterior, no third row seat which many people in this price range opt for, and a bland look. Oh yeah, people cross shopping, a Tesla, Escalade or Range Rover will definitely have this beauty

The issue is that he’s advertising his shoes without paying Ferrari for a license to the rights to use their trademark. This is what de-values the Ferrari brand. If advertisers that do pay Ferrari for the rights to use the Ferrari trademark see that Philip Plein used the Ferrari brand and did it for free, then they

My nuanced take: Ferrari is overstepping their bounds but I, also, would not want to be associated with those nasty-ass shoes.

I remember Rock was worried about the fight in Fast Five looking like he’d get beaten too badly, so I imagine Diesel’s numbering system idea is inspired by that.

Out of all three of them, Diesel seems by far most reasonable to me. 

You will never hear me argue about Lewis’s incredible talent, ability, and success as he is truly one of the sports greatest.

I’m confused by the premise of this entire article. What are we supposed to rally for? I agree that any workforce employed in the eventual construction should be comprised of folks who live in the immediate area - no contention there. But why is it bad to tear to it down and replace it with streets? Are we supposed to

San Fran always claimed that “tearing down the Embarcadero Freeway” was going to democratize the City. Same theory as here. OOPS.

Maybe the black guy auditioned for the part all on his own and happened to be the best actor to read for it. You never know.

How is it racist? And there are other black superheroes in the show.

Nobody here asserted that Polanski isn’t responsible for what he actually did do, here in the real world. The discussion was speculating about whether Polanski would have done the same kinds of things if Tate hadn’t died. Those who are saying “It’s impossible” are idiots, and those who are saying “He definitely

It’s not exactly wishful thinking; the notion that a hugely traumatic event in one’s life, specifically one that deprives a person of a partner who is a good moral influence on them, could lead to that person doing things they might not have done if their partner was around, isn’t at all unlikely.

I’m here for the “Tarantino sucks” lukewarm takes

So just to get out ahead of this why is it ok to rewrite WW2 but not the Manson murders? I mean obviously doing both is fine but why the negative reaction to the second?