Give me the Amy Sedaris spin-off show Disney+

I’m not super interested in all the Manda-lore so I’m glad to see we’re making quick progress on it

Just as long as we don’t see any ancient Jedi temples with magic powers that extend far beyond anything ever seen in regular Star Wars stories (Filoni’s most frustrating trope), I’ll be okay.

I don’t think Rowling is a good writer. The last book I read from her is Goblet of Fire (and I only watched the first of those movies). Some people have a big emotional investment in her, for better or worse, because they read Harry Potter as children who didn’t know what good writing is. Admittedly, I haven’t read…

It’s a brilliant move by the BBC to tie up with JK. She’s on fire right now. Just look how much free publicity you shitstains generate every time she does a project!

He’s just really cute and everyone wants to hug and kiss him. 

What of that “critical part” of the Newswire was actually new?

compartmentalize the heck out of the promotional tour.

Disney is going to care if their movies stop making money, though. Looks like people might be starting to vote with their wallets.

“The students don’t have to be representatives of the state, you spoon.”

Oh look, you found a quote and you’re spamming it. The ACLU is arguing that public colleges and universities as government entities cannot shut down free speech. But you’re not complaining about that. You’re complaining about rival student groups shouting down speakers. In what way are these students representatives…

Still not censorship in any form that would prohibited under the first amendment.

So, it’s censorship if a university’s astronomy department refuses to give flat-earthers a platform?  The medical school should have lectures by people who believe disease is caused by an imbalance in bodily humors?

Dont you have something better to do like scare away the crows or clean your used bedsheets with two holes?  

The AV Club comes out in favor of censorship.

I believe in freedom of speech in the sense that the government should not put their thumb on the scale and decide who gets the right to speak. That is dangerous for any number of reasons and that’s why it’s prohibited in the Constitution.

There’s a difference between leftist and liberal. Soviet Russia was leftist - but very illiberal. This distinction is lost on many.

Yeah. Authoritarianism would involve banning him from speaking anywhere. He can still blog. He can still rent private venues and sell tickets to his ‘debates’ or ‘lectures’ or whatever. Hell, he can even rant on street corners.

Comparing someone like Angela Davis to Milo is insane. People like him are attention whores. He doesn’t go to college campuses and other venues to participate in “ a marketplace of ideas.” He goes there to build a brand. Every speaking event is an opportunity to post “blue-haired she/her liberal cries gets demolished!!…

Milo’s not there to debate in good faith. He wants to promote his views, which are already known to be appalling — all in the name of earning a few bucks as a provocateur.