When I was a kid I’d grab the supernatural/ghost/cryptid books from the library shelf and flip through to the creepiest illustrations, basically daring myself to look at creepy charcoal drawings of greys/yetis knowing full well I was spiking my ability to sleep at all that night. The trailer gives me that.

No dude, once you get a pet you have to take care of it, specially when you are filthy rich.

anyone that buys animals for clout, put the animals on their merch and then abandons it are garbage. stop defending this twat.

We should absolutely hold people responsible that only get animals when they’re small and then expect others to finish caring for the animals for the rest of their lives.  I don’t care if he rehomed it, he shouldn’t have got it in the first place, so he’s still responsible for whatever happens to that animal.

Come on, you’re simping for Logan Paul? That’s pretty pathetic.

It’s a fantastic movie if you’re on its wavelength, and a goofy never-ending bore if you’re not. I’m fully on board with it and think all the “scariest movie ever” hype has something to it (I certainly can’t remember the last time a film made me feel such bone-deep dread), but it isn’t hard to imagine someone getting…

An important part of the story is that he bought a pig as a pet, not understanding that they grow up to become regular sized pigs.

So you know Paul personally have direct knowledge of the background search he conducted to know the “horse ranch” was on the up and up?

It was irresponsible of him to get a pig in the first place if he wasn’t capable of devoting the time and effort necessary to properly care for it.

Unlikely. The survival time for a conventionally clothed person in the North Atlantic is less than it would take to stop and turn the ship. Life is cheap, coal isn’t.

The thing to remember with most of these is that movies aren’t real. There is no objective truth about most of these because they were written to be ambiguous. They never had to actually decide if the top in Inception would fall or spin forever because they wanted the question to be the point, not the non-existent…

Was expecting this one, but I guess it’s less a “debate” and more just a mystery.
Was it gold? Drugs? Marcelis Wallace’s soul?
I think it was trouble. 

In Pulp Fiction, what’s in the suitcase?

I enjoyed it thoroughly, it drew me right in, even though a lot of the dialogue went right over my head. It’s definitely a high-brow affair.

What does that have to do with how good the movie is? People are still afraid of theaters, I’m sure. 

And if you can’t find a willing adult, ask yourself what you need to change about you to make people willing rather than trying to make it their fault for denying you the sex you think you are owed.

Didn’t old AV Club have a feature where they broke down the mise-en-scène of film scenes? How far we’ve fallen

It’s always going to be a niche movie, but let’s not act like there isn’t genuine appreciation and passion for the movie. Box office is only part of the story.

Not nitpicky at all. The old AV Club knew their shit, and had the editors to correct it if required. Also could cite the phrase “mise-en-scène” without Pavlovian snarkback.

He can’t do any work for the citizens because he hasn’t been sworn in yet. The House can’t do any official business -- including swearing in new members — until they pick a speaker.