I don’t think much of her at all, in general, but those who want to vote for her as some kind of masturbatory exercise tend to point to her moral compass.

I’m not wasting my time arguing with idiots who have already made up their minds. I’m guessing you’re like one of those people who just thinks everyone gets honked at while they are driving, as opposed to realizing that they are a terrible driver.

I didn’t miss your point. Your point was stupid.

I just requested so much time off work to go volunteer at HQ. I don’t know what else to do.

I mean, I wasn’t going to eat any of the refugees anyway.

I’m okay with “hivemind”, where “hivemind” = giving a shit about the future of the country.

Jill Stein is in no way qualified to be President. I know plenty of well-educated doctors with admirable moral compasses who have been slightly involved with very local politics, and they aren’t qualified to be President either.

FWIW, most likely what happened is that when the attack happened, the Clinton campaign was inundated with emails and calls asking for a plan/accusing them of not having a plan, and so they released it immediately rather than waiting for whatever their planned release date was. This happens all the time.

I have zero issue with chastity, but I do take issue with calling it “sexual integrity” and I believe that term is categorically anti-feminist.

I guess we can take comfort that he probably can’t bring Melania and Don Jr to the next one.

It makes me so damn frustrated too. There’s a significant portion of our population who listens to the absolute nonsense he spouts and just takes it as gospel. “Just take the oil” “The intelligence officials hate the President” etc. It doesn’t even OCCUR to them to think about it for one more second or look into it at…

But why?? Why does he get to unilaterally decide who else gets this information? Didn’t the American public (or, you know, the Republican electorate) essentially resoundingly decide that they did NOT want Christie to receive classified intel?

1) Doesn’t the very fact that the interviewer had to repeatedly stress to Trump not to get into the specifics of his intelligence briefing make the entire point about Trump not being fit to be the President?

But I thought the whole thing was that she set it up SPECIFICALLY to use as SoS. What does it have to do with anything if she had her own private email server when she wasn’t holding any type of government position?

The final quote in the article says:

Interesting that she’d been using the personal server as sec of state for a year when her email above is dated 3 days after Obama’s first inauguration.

Is there any journalist IN THE WORLD who will point out to Trump in person that while he is saying a lot of words he is not actually saying anything? I mean besides Jon Stewart, who is not technically a journalist.

When a woman is drunkenly sleeping in her office until the trains start running again, I see no scenario where “a brief conversation” leads to consensual sex.

I cannot understand what they think Hillary Clinton’s motives are, running for president when she is near death.

WHY IS THIS A THING? STOP POLITICKING PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES.