Fuck the checkout clerk at the UK supermarket where I used my chip-and-signature card with "See ID" written on the back. She asked to see something with my signature on it, I showed her my photo ID explaining that should be enough to prove I was the owner of the card. She refused to sell to me because signature…

Well, as long as its tactical.

So would that be your mustache, or?

Football and rain returning to the Pacific Northwest.

I paid for a magical negro, not a magical white guy from the suburbs!

That sounds made up.

PC Load Letter.

U mad bro?

Agreed. It's why I don't get pedantic about the modern use of the word "ironic" but I DO get pedantic about the modern use of the word "literally". The meaning of the former has evolved to where the speaker's meaning is clear, whereas the superfluous use of the latter muddles its actual meaning.

This needs more upvotes.

I always crushed pretty hard on Jake Sisko. Those fitted vests are like catnip.

I think he was referring more to the third thing being a non-earth thing, which isn't really the "rule of threes", especially as they didn't really play those lines for comedic effect. I think it was more an attempt at Trek-verse worldbuilding; to show that there are all these histories and backstories in this…

Hey, your first-hand professional opinion has no place here!

Phew!

I dunno, huw are you?

OK, you get an upvote too.

Ever been to the Amazon campus in Seattle? It's like the fucking Stepford Wives.

🎵 Rowdowser saves us and saves all the woooorld 🎵

There's a great show called Survivorman that's just like Bear Grylls except the guy actually survives alone in the wilderness (he films everything himself). The jungle episodes are basically him sitting in endless rain, getting bitten by insects, and trying to prevent boot rot.

Do we have to side with either?