Bruce is "ambiguously gendered"....
Bruce is "ambiguously gendered"....
it's Bruce!
I am less impressed by the fact that they are trying to make "drippity drop" sound like a legit hip hop term, and more impressed by what can only be described as the "sexual clapping" That was priceless. I hope that catches on. I can do that move.
it doesn't matter how you try to spin it, unless they stepped out of their bed, as per the #wokeuplikethis, and the magazine's claims of No Make-up, with all the product they had on their face when that photo was taken already mutated into them like professor Xavier's version of supermodels, it's just more bullshit…
And yet "No make-up is truly no make-up" Unless it's actually multiple different types of make-up products used explicitly to make IT appear to be no make-up. Then it's just outright make-up and a misrepresentation of the facts.
gosh. I always wake up dusted with translucent powder, pinching my cheeks, with my lips covered in tinted "Chapstick". Little bluebirds also settle my robe upon my shoulders while friendly mice wearing t-shirts and hats place slippers on my feet and I sing "tra lah lah...tra lah lah".
okay people. If you are coming to Canada to let a guy named Cobra stick inky needles into your eyeballs at a tattoo convention you kind of deserve to go blind. I say that as a very tattooed Canadian.
yeah, one of my sisters was a model before she became a photographer. I highly doubt there wasn't any make-up at all of any kind used on this shot.
I mean all women have the exact same lip colour right and subtle blush of the cheek right?
hahahah....you be trolling
nah...it's just a "flare"
plus I doubt if the photographer wasn't using a diffuser on his lens. So they didn't filter the photo in post. That doesn't mean they didn't filter in during production.
one of my son's got the hairy gene out of my kids. Lucky chap. He's okay with it though because we started telling him when he was very young that it is because He is distantly related to Wolverine. Turn a negative into a positive.
no make-up in magazine talk is still code for full face of skillfully applied yet imperceptible product to the rest of the world.
you claim your intention was to read and comment critically and yet failed to note that 90% of the article was written specifically with a mind to aspects of beauty from a uniquely Iranian perspective ( note: not a western standard). Strong eyebrows, thick lashes, a nod to how one is typically expected to deal with…
I think that's disengenuous. You clearly stated that you hated the tone of the piece, especially the quote about the grandmother's blonde hair and blue eyes making her the most beautiful girl in the village. You can walk back that statement because you didnt get a chorus of agreement to it. But in that case, how is it…
my grandmother didn't give beauty advice. She smoked a lot of cigarettes, wore a lot of mumus, and said things like " smarten up chickaboom!"
I mean, it's a price of writing relating someone's personal experience with their culture. Would you rather she had not been honest in her writing so that you didn't feel uncomfortable with it. this article is not even about the perception of blonde women being the ideal of beauty in Iran aside from a single statement…
Ahahahah! it looks like the dark haired ken doll.
he's not wrong