chewist
Chewist
chewist

But you've done something very common in propoganda, you've posed out of nothing the possibility that a critique is in existence. "I'm not saying dogs are killing people, but have you ever noticed how many dog owners die?" You then lay down a false story, about how liberals seem to think any harm is something to be

I'm a bit confused by the idea that criticism equals banning. If I say they should stop making remakes, it is not the same thing as saying ban remakes. Complaining that stories are being remade or that the retelling of a type of story is offensive is not the same thing as stopping the production. In fact the only

Slippery Slope is a logical fallacy

Although a handful did abuse the south, a large number were there to help. Of most importance, many were there to help former slaves, surprise surprise, many southerners deeply disliked any attempt to assist former slaves. Carpetbaggers were often portrayed negatively because of this help to blacks and not the harm to

I know the myth of the carpetbaggers and the terrible black people is how southerners view the Reconstruction. I know the reality of how white upper class was able to maintain their position, and with minor encroachment able to restrict changes to their society. I know that southerners still lust after southern power,

As a southerner, if the North had actually made the south know they lost and not get to continue their belief in southern awesomeness, we would be much better off. Instead the north simply handed it back and said, now you be good, southerners laughing their ass off for a century, order kept in place as though it was

""Parker says a 'witch hunt is coming' for the show"
That's about as much of an admission that their "both sides are bad" philosophy has fueled the political thoughts of a generation of assholes and they aren't interested in refuting them in any way as we're going to get."

I love someone with the simplest idea ever "both sides are equally bad" has the balls to call someone else out for simplicity. The inability to see nuance is the basis of your whole stance.

You know if this leads to the death of the "party as comedy" movie, then let the death knell ring. Let the subversive R-rated comedies brew under the radar into something decent without grown 40/50 years olds acting like they are 18 year old frat boys.

I can't wait for the awkwardness of my congressman, Fred Upton, looking up naked pics of his niece, Kate Upton… family dinner is going to be awkward

I'm a big defender of late series Simpsons, I think they are solid, if not as edgy as the old ones. That being said, this seasons been rough, and this episode was spasmodic, bland and really a missed opportunity for an ingenious idea to reintegrate into the past episodes.

Maybe actors have different needs and expectations for film making? Like an actual work place, not a desire to entertain us. Acting gigs based on people you work with and environment. Directors, editors, & studio determine if they stuff turns out okay. How many great actors end up in terrible things. Actors have the

Equally bad that we don't remember them (I can't say I know the Ritz brothers, but Wheeler and Woolsey were very good). But it might be worse to be known for the wrong thing. Think knowing Groucho for being on "What's My Line," Bill Hicks for his Acura commercial, or Eddie Murphy for his transsexual arrest. Is it

Does this movie look good; No. Does Jerry Lewis deserve better than for annoying little piss ants like William Hughes to only know him as the holocaust clown guy; Yes.

Between that Andie MacDowell meets 80s Jersey hair and the 90s love of shoulder pads, Elaine had some fashion hurdles she couldn't overcome

Under 30s know that guy from "It's Always Sunny"… it's nice those guys let one of their dads be on the TV!

In defense, I think actors have learned that animated films are a money train that doesn't affect how audiences see the actor. And rightly so, I believe, as when we look back on animated films we rarely think of the actors voicing the characters. Tom Hanks as good as he is, I don't think is or will be remembered for

Is this going to be the liberal version of "Last Man Standing"?

Note, I don't want to speak ill of the Cleveland team, and I feel bad for those mid 90s teams that were very good and ran into the Braves and Yankee powers, and the oddity of the Marlins "let suck for years, then buy everyone for one season then sell everyone after winning the championship" model. Cleveland was very

Quality season or not they were quality players. And you can say what you want about better picture, but I'd take Steve Avery career over all but Martinez and Hershiser. And it shows in the series were those great Cleveland bats couldn't hit anyone (oddly with the exception of Smoltz) and everyone of those great