You can’t tell me adding “revenge” as a forth section after “eat, pray, love” wouldn't be compelling.

its important to note, while watching the clip, how much larger bardem’s head is than julia’s

They might have, but it’s also a relatively small subset of people in the US who are offended, and a bigger number that think it’s exciting and donate because of it.

Maybe you just used a bad example, but I don’t see anything wrong with that scenario.

Probably because an NGO approached her and told her about all the good she can do. Because there are people who are going to donate because of her.

Only the ones who sued them.

The families came after them, they are now trying to recover some of the costs from the actions of the families. If someone brings a frivolous suit against you are you going to just forgive the money you’re out for fighting that?

The plaintiffs have already said THEY aren’t going to let it go. This is a fight between a bunch of lawyers. Cinemark’s are almost certainly trying to end this where they’ll agree to forgo the costs while getting an agreement not to appeal further.

I do understand their desire to balance their books. Fiscally and legally, perhaps it even makes sense. But it's really cold to sue families of victims who were gunned down in your theater, from a human point of view. If it were me, I would rather have good publicity and loyal customers, than recoup legal fees.

But they won at a cost of 700,000. If you had lost 700,000 dollars in order not to lose even more money due to charges that were unreasonable in the first place, would you feel victorious, or would you feel that you deserved to be paid the money spent on defending yourself?

to be fair...the families did go after them first.

How about saying, “Don’t bring frivolous lawsuits?” That’s a good place to start. And, as the story already said, this is a tactic to ensure that plaintiffs don’t appeal. The plaintiffs will agree not to appeal, and the request for fees and costs will be dropped.

But as I read it, it was the cost of defending themselves against the families claim that the theater should have had security.

Holy shit.

Boy, yeah, if I were dying, “who can fertilize my eggs after I’m dead?” would not in any way factor into the shit I’d be asking for.

I have never tried a bare foof and whilst I might end up liking the sensation, I almost certainly would not have the energy to maintain it. I barely manage to shave my legs (and I do it in a resentful and slapdash fashion) so I will keep my nether foliage as it is - vaguely trimmed if I remember, thick and full as a…

When I was pregnant, I could not believe how many women on pregnancy boards were stressed about their ability to groom their pubes before Ob/Gyn appointments. I found it so upsetting that amidst all of the joys/pains of pregnancy that would even register as a “concern”.

Especially because the body grows hair there for hygienic reasons! Like armpit or head hair the hair traps and disperses bacteria and sweat. So remember kids, a hairy snatch is a clean snatch.

Its kinda disturbing that some women think pubic hair is dirty or unhygienic or whatever.

Thank fucking god my husband doesn’t care, I would have a hard time not laughing while defending my flourishing pubes as a feminist statement.