I... don't even know what that means.

Scent differs from woman to woman, so you're a little hasty in diagnosing vaginosis unless you're an MD of some relevant sort.

Please tell me that this is a real ad. Please. Even if you have to lie.

I am willing to let it slide for anybody who was born before the Civil War.

And I'll just leave this here:

It makes perfect sense, because physiologically it does indeed extend inward and wrap around the walls of the vagina. See the diagrams here:

Hey, there's nothing wrong with not being into a literary genre. Different strokes for different folks. "Her" is not a movie for everyone; neither is "Sophie's Choice", "Star Wars", or "Ernest Goes To Camp". If we all liked exactly the same things, we'd be a pretty boring species.

Decca, I'd see it as more understandable. SPOILERS AHEAD:

Me too. I also thought that the non-sequitir bursts of laughter were eerily reminiscent of David Lynch's "Rabbits".

I think a gender-reversed "Her" would completely work. I can't even see the need to change anything besides names and pronouns. It certainly wouldn't have deterred me from seeing it, or have changed the ultimate message.

Actually, if you read science fiction and are familiar with its literary sub-genres, you can recognize this as an example of the "singularity" trope — the idea that machine intelligence would begin to progress many orders of magnitude faster than human intelligence, to the point where the machines either take over…

Actually, it starts to sour on their romantic vacation together, when she introduces him to another AI that she and her fellow OSes have synthesized by analyzing the works of a great writer and duplicating his personality. This is when he realizes that she has grown far beyond him intellectually and socially.

The next time my lady implies that I'm too slow with household chores, I'm gonna blame it on the shirt she bought me last Xmas.

Yay! Thanks for saying so. :-)

I wonder if it's because of my dabbling in quantum physics, where an unknown binary condition is viewed not as a choice between two distinct states, but as a superposition containing the two possible states.

Actually, it's perfectly appropriate. The term "he or she" has an implicit plural in the two possibilities. Using the plural "they" to stand for "he or she" is very elegant. Likewise, "give it to him or her" becomes "give it to them".

Oh, it's here. It's just that there are still a lot of those embarrassing models hanging around, thinking that somehow they're going to prevail.

+1 for the Venture Bros. reference. :-)

It's the guys who say things like, "Girls only like assholes. I'm so nice to them, and they never give me the time of day." What they are saying is that they are friends with girls in hopes of getting to be their boyfriends, instead of being accepted or rejected as a potential suitor by stating that up-front.

No, there's nothing wrong with you. Some people prefer relationships to evolve out of friendship, where companionship and trust evolve into physical intimacy instead of the other way around. There are both guys and gals like this.